F.J. Tewes

445 total citations
8 papers, 383 citations indexed

About

F.J. Tewes is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. According to data from OpenAlex, F.J. Tewes has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 383 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cancer Research, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. Recurrent topics in F.J. Tewes's work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (6 papers), Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (4 papers) and Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (2 papers). F.J. Tewes is often cited by papers focused on Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (6 papers), Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (4 papers) and Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (2 papers). F.J. Tewes collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. F.J. Tewes's co-authors include T.J. Meisgen, E. Roemer, Detlef J. Veltel, Edward L. Carmines, F. S. Hsu, Ragnar Rylander, Linda C. Koo, G. Patskan, Willy Gomm and Hans‐Juergen Haussmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Food and Chemical Toxicology, Environmental Research and Toxicology.

In The Last Decade

F.J. Tewes

8 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
F.J. Tewes United States	8	184	179	85	84	49	8	383
T.J. Meisgen United States	9	244 1.3×	250 1.4×	105 1.2×	93 1.1×	53 1.1×	10	492
Eian D. Massey United Kingdom	8	185 1.0×	157 0.9×	93 1.1×	131 1.6×	14 0.3×	13	478
Detlef J. Veltel United States	8	237 1.3×	232 1.3×	110 1.3×	97 1.2×	11 0.2×	9	456
J.A. Bodnar United States	8	152 0.8×	116 0.6×	127 1.5×	89 1.1×	12 0.2×	10	361
Shuzo Okazaki Japan	10	93 0.5×	63 0.4×	21 0.2×	89 1.1×	39 0.8×	26	337
Grantley D. Charles United States	12	275 1.5×	98 0.5×	12 0.1×	81 1.0×	30 0.6×	17	452
Hemalatha Murli United States	11	66 0.4×	138 0.8×	29 0.3×	148 1.8×	12 0.2×	21	385
Bonnie Sharratt United States	9	193 1.0×	119 0.7×	68 0.8×	162 1.9×	33 0.7×	9	430
Alice Marmugi France	8	330 1.8×	73 0.4×	74 0.9×	96 1.1×	12 0.2×	9	551
Emiko Asakawa Japan	11	60 0.3×	133 0.7×	17 0.2×	188 2.2×	22 0.4×	18	392

Countries citing papers authored by F.J. Tewes

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F.J. Tewes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.J. Tewes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.J. Tewes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F.J. Tewes

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.J. Tewes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.J. Tewes. The network helps show where F.J. Tewes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F.J. Tewes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F.J. Tewes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F.J. Tewes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F.J. Tewes. F.J. Tewes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Stabbert, Regina, Ruth Dempsey, Christian Euchenhofer, et al.. (2017). Studies on the contributions of smoke constituents, individually and in mixtures, in a range of in vitro bioactivity assays. Toxicology in Vitro. 42. 222–246. 40 indexed citations

Gaworski, Charles L., T.J. Meisgen, F.J. Tewes, et al.. (2009). Effect of filtration by activated charcoal on the toxicological activity of cigarette mainstream smoke from experimental cigarettes. Inhalation Toxicology. 21(8). 688–704. 23 indexed citations

Hsu, F. S., et al.. (2006). Development of a commercial cigarette “market map” comparison methodology for evaluating new or non-conventional cigarettes. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 46(3). 225–242. 48 indexed citations

Meisgen, T.J., et al.. (2006). The mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase assay for the assessment and comparison of the mutagenic activity of cigarette mainstream smoke particulate phase. Toxicology. 227(3). 193–210. 41 indexed citations

Chouchane, Salem, et al.. (2006). Involvement of Semiquinone Radicals in the in Vitro Cytotoxicity of Cigarette Mainstream Smoke. Chemical Research in Toxicology. 19(12). 1602–1610. 27 indexed citations

Tewes, F.J., T.J. Meisgen, Detlef J. Veltel, E. Roemer, & G. Patskan. (2003). Toxicological evaluation of an electrically heated cigarette. Part 3: Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of mainstream smoke. Journal of Applied Toxicology. 23(5). 341–348. 50 indexed citations

Roemer, E., F.J. Tewes, T.J. Meisgen, Detlef J. Veltel, & Edward L. Carmines. (2002). Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 3: In vitro genotoxicity and cytotoxicity. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 40(1). 105–111. 96 indexed citations

Tewes, F.J., Linda C. Koo, T.J. Meisgen, & Ragnar Rylander. (1990). Lung cancer risk and mutagenicity of tea. Environmental Research. 52(1). 23–33. 58 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact