Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Wishlade
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Wishlade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Wishlade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Wishlade more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Wishlade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Wishlade. The network helps show where Fiona Wishlade may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fiona Wishlade
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fiona Wishlade.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fiona Wishlade based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Fiona Wishlade. Fiona Wishlade is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wishlade, Fiona, et al.. (2017). Financial Instruments in Practice : Uptake and Limitations. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).1 indexed citations
2.
Wishlade, Fiona. (2015). Another generation in competition policy control of regional development policy. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).1 indexed citations
Méndez, Carlos, Fiona Wishlade, & John Bachtler. (2012). Negotiation boxes and blocks : crafting a deal on the EU budget and cohesion policy. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).1 indexed citations
Méndez, Carlos, John Bachtler, & Fiona Wishlade. (2012). Cohesion policy after 2013: a critical assessment of the legislative proposals. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).2 indexed citations
Wishlade, Fiona. (2011). Setting the Scene for Competition Policy Control of Regional Aid 2014. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).1 indexed citations
10.
Méndez, Carlos, John Bachtler, & Fiona Wishlade. (2011). A Budget and Cohesion Policy for Europe 2020: Let the Negotiations Begin. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).1 indexed citations
11.
Wishlade, Fiona. (2009). Crisis, what crisis? Business as usual for EU competition policy and regional aid control. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).
12.
Wishlade, Fiona. (2009). Measure for Measure : Recent Developments in EU Competition Policy and Regional Aid Control. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).1 indexed citations
Wishlade, Fiona. (2003). Regional state aid and competition policy in the European Union. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).20 indexed citations
Allen, Kevin, et al.. (1999). European Regional Incentives: 1990.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.