F.H. D'Emden
Impact in
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Agricultural Economics and Policy
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Papers in
-
- Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems 5
- Bioenergy crop production and management 1
-
- Weed Control and Herbicide Applications 4
- Co-authors
- Rick Llewellyn (7 shared papers)Michael Burton (2 shared papers)Stephen B. Powles (1 shared paper)Mechelle Owen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (1 paper)Weed Science (1 paper)Technological Forecasting and Social Change (1 paper)Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture (1 paper)UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
F.H. D'Emden
7 papers receiving 314 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 164
- Agronomy and Crop Science 98
- Soil Science 83
- Business and International Management 15
- Forestry 17
Countries citing papers authored by F.H. D'Emden
This map shows the geographic impact of F.H. D'Emden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.H. D'Emden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.H. D'Emden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F.H. D'Emden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.H. D'Emden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.H. D'Emden. The network helps show where F.H. D'Emden may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside F.H. D'Emden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 136 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 125 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 5 | Rural landholder attitudes towards the responsibilities and action for managing declared weeds in Western Australia | 2004 | 3 |
| 6 | No-till adoption and the weed management challenge. | 2004 | 3 |
| 7 | How much is enough: the steep final steps to extensive no-tillage cropping in Australia | 2010 | 2 |
About F.H. D'Emden
F.H. D'Emden is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Soil Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 7 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (5 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (4 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (2 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (2 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (1 paper), Bioenergy crop production and management (1 paper) and Agriculture and Rural Development Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (164 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (98 citations), Soil Science (83 citations), Business and International Management (15 citations) and Forestry (17 citations). F.H. D'Emden has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rick Llewellyn, Michael Burton, Stephen B. Powles and Mechelle Owen. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Weed Science, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.