Fernando Mota

1.6k citations
47 papers · 1.4k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Fernando Mota

47 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Fernando Mota
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 500
  • Biophysics 166
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 460
  • Inorganic Chemistry 282
  • Spectroscopy 290
Replace Eugenii Ya. Misochko with:
Eugenii Ya. Misochko Russia
R. Subra France
D.S. Tinti United States
Antonio Carlos Borin Brazil
Paul A. Dobosh United States
Jean‐Pierre Daudey France
Gottfried Olbrich Germany
Markéta Munzarová Czechia
G. Berthier France
Ria Broer Netherlands
Fernando Mota relative to Eugenii Ya. Misochko Russia Eugenii Ya. Misochko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Eugenii Ya. Misochko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Mota

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Mota's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Mota with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Mota more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Mota

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Mota. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Mota. The network helps show where Fernando Mota may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Mota, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Mota Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Mota links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000149
2 2009120
3 201174
4 199771
5 200063
6 199859
7 199957
8 201055
9 199755
10 201454
11 198853
12 199252
13 201334
14 199834
15 200634
16 199334
17 200033
18 200231
19 201228
20 199123

About Fernando Mota

Fernando Mota is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (15 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (14 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (11 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (10 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (7 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (6 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (5 papers) and Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (500 citations), Biophysics (166 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (460 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (282 citations) and Spectroscopy (290 citations). Fernando Mota has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Juan J. Novoa, Joel S. Miller, Santiago Álvarez, Jaume Veciana, Mercè Deumal, Pilar Lafuente, Marc Planas, Concepció Rovira, J. Vidal-Gancedo and Carlos Pérez del Valle. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemical Physics Letters, Chemistry - A European Journal, The Journal of Chemical Physics and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact