Fernando Montes

2.4k citations
90 papers · 1.8k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Fernando Montes

86 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Fernando Montes
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 961
  • Global and Planetary Change 807
  • Environmental Engineering 428
  • Ecological Modeling 117
  • Insect Science 322
Replace Matteo Garbarino with:
Matteo Garbarino Italy
Peter Annighöfer Germany
Hugues Claessens Belgium
Mathias Neumann Austria
Xiangdong Lei China
Dominik Hessenmöller Germany
Jana Müllerová Czechia
Christopher D. Philipson Switzerland
David Pothier Canada
Annabel J. Porté France
Fernando Montes relative to Matteo Garbarino Italy Matteo Garbarino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Matteo Garbarino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Montes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Montes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Montes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Montes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Montes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Montes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Montes. The network helps show where Fernando Montes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Montes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Montes Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Montes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011108
2 200789
3 201570
4 200967
5 200463
6 201556
7 200954
8 201949
9 201248
10 200444
11 200744
12 201241
13 200540
14 201839
15 201839
16 200938
17 200538
18 200937
19 201737
20 201532

About Fernando Montes

Fernando Montes is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Ecology and Insect Science, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (44 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (28 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (20 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (19 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (19 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (18 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (14 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (961 citations), Global and Planetary Change (807 citations), Environmental Engineering (428 citations), Ecological Modeling (117 citations) and Insect Science (322 citations). Fernando Montes has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Indonesia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Isabel Cañellas, Agustı́n Rubio, Mariola Sánchez‐González, J. Julio Camarero, Eugenio Díaz‐Pinés, Alicia Ledo, Cristina Gómez, Miren del Rı́o, Ignacio Barbeito and Raquel Benavides. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Annals of Forest Science, European Journal of Forest Research and Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact