Fernando Blanco

3.7k citations
125 papers · 2.9k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Fernando Blanco

120 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Fernando Blanco
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • General Decision Sciences 198
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 854
  • Inorganic Chemistry 528
  • Organic Chemistry 1.1k
  • Spectroscopy 443
Replace James R. Cox with:
James R. Cox United States
R. A. CALDWELL United States
Jason C. Cole United Kingdom
Vincenzo Galasso Italy
Scott A. Miller United States
Lisa M. Pérez United States
Harold Rosenberg United States
David Metcalf United States
Jeffrey S. Johnson United States
W. J. Jones United Kingdom
Fernando Blanco relative to James R. Cox United States James R. Cox's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
James R. Cox · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Blanco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Blanco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Blanco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Blanco more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Blanco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Blanco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Blanco. The network helps show where Fernando Blanco may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Blanco, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Blanco Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Blanco links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 125 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009248
2 2007176
3 2008164
4 2015104
5 2008103
6 200971
7 200870
8 200566
9 201165
10 201356
11 200953
12 201049
13 200947
14 201246
15 200844
16 201043
17 200541
18 201540
19 201040
20 200439

About Fernando Blanco

Fernando Blanco is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 125 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallography and molecular interactions (23 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (16 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (12 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (11 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (10 papers), Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds (10 papers) and Synthesis and Reactivity of Heterocycles (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (198 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (854 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (528 citations), Organic Chemistry (1.1k citations) and Spectroscopy (443 citations). Fernando Blanco has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Ireland and France. Frequent co-authors include José Elguero, Ibón Alkorta, Helena Matute, Miguel A. Vadillo, Mohammad Solimannejad, Itxaso Barberia, David Quiñonero, Antonio Frontera, Pere M. Deyà and Carolina Estarellas. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, PLoS ONE, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical and Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact