Ferdinandus J. de Looze

691 total citations
7 papers, 432 citations indexed

About

Ferdinandus J. de Looze is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ferdinandus J. de Looze has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 432 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 1 paper in Infectious Diseases and 1 paper in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Ferdinandus J. de Looze's work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (2 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper). Ferdinandus J. de Looze is often cited by papers focused on Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (2 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper). Ferdinandus J. de Looze collaborates with scholars based in Australia, France and Philippines. Ferdinandus J. de Looze's co-authors include David M. Purdie, Michael S. Roberts, Chris Del Mar, Seán McCarthy, Michelle A. King, Julie Stokes, Paul Glasziou, Barry M. McGrath, Nirmala Pandeya and Andreas Suhrbier and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ, Diabetologia and Vaccine.

In The Last Decade

Ferdinandus J. de Looze

7 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ferdinandus J. de Looze Australia 7 168 98 93 81 71 7 432
Deborah Kelly Canada 11 173 1.0× 69 0.7× 123 1.3× 140 1.7× 42 0.6× 39 549
Sonali Kulkarni United States 12 57 0.3× 41 0.4× 134 1.4× 140 1.7× 82 1.2× 19 548
Karen Gunning United States 10 78 0.5× 57 0.6× 60 0.6× 48 0.6× 33 0.5× 28 292
Alexander Beveridge Australia 9 69 0.4× 34 0.3× 42 0.5× 158 2.0× 41 0.6× 21 369
P Crome United Kingdom 7 94 0.6× 51 0.5× 81 0.9× 81 1.0× 68 1.0× 11 677
Michelle Condren United States 15 160 1.0× 94 1.0× 130 1.4× 24 0.3× 8 0.1× 43 691
Qaiser Mukhtar United States 10 48 0.3× 71 0.7× 172 1.8× 61 0.8× 62 0.9× 22 463
Dewey C. Scheid United States 13 31 0.2× 75 0.8× 79 0.8× 38 0.5× 30 0.4× 26 518
Zahra Alsairafi Kuwait 13 38 0.2× 40 0.4× 76 0.8× 24 0.3× 24 0.3× 26 364
Schappert Sm United States 7 21 0.1× 56 0.6× 105 1.1× 29 0.4× 57 0.8× 9 418

Countries citing papers authored by Ferdinandus J. de Looze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ferdinandus J. de Looze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ferdinandus J. de Looze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ferdinandus J. de Looze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ferdinandus J. de Looze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ferdinandus J. de Looze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ferdinandus J. de Looze. The network helps show where Ferdinandus J. de Looze may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ferdinandus J. de Looze

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ferdinandus J. de Looze. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ferdinandus J. de Looze based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ferdinandus J. de Looze. Ferdinandus J. de Looze is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Proietto, Joseph, Jaret Malloy, Dongliang Zhuang, et al.. (2018). Efficacy and safety of methionine aminopeptidase 2 inhibition in type 2 diabetes: a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Diabetologia. 61(9). 1918–1922. 16 indexed citations
2.
Carrington, M., Garry Jennings, Mark Harris, et al.. (2015). Impact of nurse-mediated management on achieving blood pressure goal levels in primary care: Insights from the Valsartan Intensified Primary carE Reduction of Blood Pressure Study. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 15(6). 409–416. 8 indexed citations
3.
Nolan, Terry, Charissa Borja-Tabora, Ferdinandus J. de Looze, et al.. (2015). Safety, immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children, adolescents, and adults: A randomized, controlled, phase III trial. Vaccine. 33(21). 2485–2492. 43 indexed citations
4.
Stewart, Simon, Nigel Stocks, Louise M. Burrell, et al.. (2014). More rigorous protocol adherence to intensive structured management improves blood pressure control in primary care. Journal of Hypertension. 32(6). 1342–1350. 7 indexed citations
5.
Stewart, Simon, M. Carrington, Craig S. Anderson, et al.. (2012). Effect of intensive structured care on individual blood pressure targets in primary care: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 345(nov20 1). e7156–e7156. 87 indexed citations
6.
Purdie, David M., Nirmala Pandeya, Andreas Suhrbier, et al.. (2002). Natural history of Ross River virus‐induced epidemic polyarthritis. The Medical Journal of Australia. 177(7). 356–360. 82 indexed citations
7.
Roberts, Michael S., Julie Stokes, Michelle A. King, et al.. (2001). Outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of a clinical pharmacy intervention in 52 nursing homes. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 51(3). 257–265. 189 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026