Fengping Wang

721 citations
26 papers · 540 · h-index 13

Impact in

    • Marine Sponges and Natural Products
    • Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
    • Fungal Biology and Applications

Papers in

Fengping Wang

25 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers

Fengping Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Biotechnology 144
  • Pharmacology 205
  • Toxicology 20
  • Rehabilitation 31
  • Nephrology 26
Replace Grace Chiou with:
Grace Chiou United States
Sonny Larsson Sweden
Jingli Tang China
Lemei An China
Tahira Batool Pakistan
Jiayu Chen China
Tomasz Gębarowski Poland
Tao You China
Valquíria P. Medeiros Brazil
Fengping Wang relative to Grace Chiou United States Grace Chiou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Grace Chiou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fengping Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fengping Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fengping Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fengping Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fengping Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fengping Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fengping Wang. The network helps show where Fengping Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fengping Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fengping Wang Line = papers co-authored together Fengping Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008137
2 201054
3 200945
4 200742
5 202339
6 201736
7 200732
8 200725
9 202022
10 201521
11 202115
12 201714
13 201712
14 20229
15 20256
16 20236
17 20235
18 20214
19 20184
20 20173

About Fengping Wang

Fengping Wang is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Nephrology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (6 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (3 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (3 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (2 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (2 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (2 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (2 papers) and Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (144 citations), Pharmacology (205 citations), Toxicology (20 citations), Rehabilitation (31 citations) and Nephrology (26 citations). Fengping Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Dehai Li, Tianjiao Zhu, Xiang Xiao, Lin Du, Qianqun Gu, Shengxin Cai, Weiming Zhu, Qianqun Gu, Xuejun Peng and Jing Su. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Antibiotics, Scientific Reports, Tetrahedron Letters, Tetrahedron and Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact