Felicitas Lenz

567 total citations
8 papers, 421 citations indexed

About

Felicitas Lenz is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Felicitas Lenz has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 421 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Oncology, 2 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Felicitas Lenz's work include Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers). Felicitas Lenz is often cited by papers focused on Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers). Felicitas Lenz collaborates with scholars based in Germany and United States. Felicitas Lenz's co-authors include Dongyun Yang, Heinz‐Josef Lenz, Alexandra Pohl, Andrew Hendifar, Georg Lurje, Yan Ning, Wu Zhang, Yan Ning, Thomas Winder and Susan Groshen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research and BMC Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Felicitas Lenz

8 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Felicitas Lenz Germany 6 196 161 135 73 51 8 421
Carlos Carracedo Peru 7 250 1.3× 133 0.8× 178 1.3× 119 1.6× 63 1.2× 13 554
P. Berthézène France 12 242 1.2× 208 1.3× 242 1.8× 93 1.3× 79 1.5× 26 667
Kathryn Monson United Kingdom 10 238 1.2× 203 1.3× 111 0.8× 27 0.4× 37 0.7× 15 519
Giuseppe Nastasi Italy 11 168 0.9× 124 0.8× 60 0.4× 32 0.4× 60 1.2× 40 406
Güzin Gönüllü Türkiye 12 196 1.0× 66 0.4× 65 0.5× 41 0.6× 60 1.2× 23 467
S. Malamud United States 12 242 1.2× 128 0.8× 177 1.3× 27 0.4× 65 1.3× 40 539
Cari L. Meinhold United States 9 207 1.1× 109 0.7× 81 0.6× 29 0.4× 84 1.6× 10 483
Vikaash Kumar Canada 8 309 1.6× 264 1.6× 81 0.6× 36 0.5× 93 1.8× 22 585
Alessandro De Luca Italy 13 200 1.0× 70 0.4× 116 0.9× 91 1.2× 74 1.5× 46 521

Countries citing papers authored by Felicitas Lenz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felicitas Lenz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felicitas Lenz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felicitas Lenz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felicitas Lenz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felicitas Lenz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felicitas Lenz. The network helps show where Felicitas Lenz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Felicitas Lenz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Felicitas Lenz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Felicitas Lenz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Felicitas Lenz. Felicitas Lenz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Schubert, Barbara, Michael Krämer, Felicitas Lenz, et al.. (2017). Benefits and risks of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for decompression in patients with malignant gastrointestinal obstruction. Supportive Care in Cancer. 25(9). 2849–2856. 19 indexed citations
2.
Schuler, Markus K., Leopold Hentschel, Michael Krämer, et al.. (2016). Impact of Different Exercise Programs on Severe Fatigue in Patients Undergoing Anticancer Treatment—A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 53(1). 57–66. 32 indexed citations
3.
Hentschel, Leopold, Anke Rentsch, Felicitas Lenz, et al.. (2016). A Questionnaire Study to Assess the Value of the Vulnerable Elders Survey, G8, and Predictors of Toxicity as Screening Tools for Frailty and Toxicity in Geriatric Cancer Patients. Oncology Research and Treatment. 39(4). 210–216. 18 indexed citations
4.
Schuler, Markus K., Sebastian Gerdes, Stephan Richter, et al.. (2016). Efficacy and safety of Dexrazoxane (DRZ) in sarcoma patients receiving high cumulative doses of anthracycline therapy – a retrospective study including 32 patients. BMC Cancer. 16(1). 619–619. 18 indexed citations
5.
Hentschel, Leopold, Anke Rentsch, Beate Hornemann, et al.. (2015). Evaluation of Vulnerable Elders Survey, G8 questionnaire and Predictors of Toxicity as screening tools for frailty and toxicities in geriatric patients with cancer.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 33(15_suppl). e20538–e20538. 1 indexed citations
6.
Yang, Dongyun, Andrew Hendifar, Kayo Togawa, et al.. (2011). Survival of metastatic gastric cancer: Significance of age, sex and race/ethnicity.. PubMed. 2(2). 77–84. 165 indexed citations
7.
Hendifar, Andrew, Dongyun Yang, Felicitas Lenz, et al.. (2009). Gender Disparities in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Survival. Clinical Cancer Research. 15(20). 6391–6397. 167 indexed citations
8.
Hendifar, Andrew, Georg Lurje, Felicitas Lenz, et al.. (2008). Sex, age, and ethnicity are associated with survival in metastatic colorectal cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 26(15_suppl). 4015–4015. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026