Feisal Khan

752 total citations · 1 hit paper
13 papers, 547 citations indexed

About

Feisal Khan is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Accounting. According to data from OpenAlex, Feisal Khan has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 547 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 6 papers in Accounting. Recurrent topics in Feisal Khan's work include Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (6 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (5 papers) and Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (5 papers). Feisal Khan is often cited by papers focused on Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (6 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (5 papers) and Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (5 papers). Feisal Khan collaborates with scholars based in United States and Russia. Feisal Khan's co-authors include Nauro F. Campos and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Journal of Economic Issues and ˜The œJournal of developing areas.

In The Last Decade

Feisal Khan

13 papers receiving 492 citations

Hit Papers

How ‘Islamic’ is Islamic Banking? 2010 2026 2015 2020 2010 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Feisal Khan United States 6 474 338 247 202 38 13 547
John R. Presley United Kingdom 12 398 0.8× 388 1.1× 230 0.9× 199 1.0× 25 0.7× 48 643
Abu Umar Faruq Ahmad Malaysia 11 428 0.9× 284 0.8× 194 0.8× 113 0.6× 10 0.3× 46 467
Hüseyin Öztürk Türkiye 11 327 0.7× 242 0.7× 103 0.4× 279 1.4× 11 0.3× 26 480
Rifki Ismal Indonesia 11 364 0.8× 176 0.5× 200 0.8× 111 0.5× 11 0.3× 53 445
Beng Soon Chong Singapore 10 775 1.6× 540 1.6× 247 1.0× 522 2.6× 6 0.2× 23 914
Hafas Furqani Indonesia 12 530 1.1× 250 0.7× 331 1.3× 64 0.3× 25 0.7× 63 606
Dermot Murphy United States 10 192 0.4× 262 0.8× 83 0.3× 284 1.4× 45 1.2× 14 492
C John United States 6 760 1.6× 145 0.4× 43 0.2× 418 2.1× 28 0.7× 16 902
Engku Rabiah Adawiah Engku Ali Malaysia 11 276 0.6× 129 0.4× 141 0.6× 49 0.2× 11 0.3× 42 334
M. Shahid Ebrahim United Kingdom 12 434 0.9× 296 0.9× 73 0.3× 241 1.2× 5 0.1× 53 553

Countries citing papers authored by Feisal Khan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feisal Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feisal Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feisal Khan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feisal Khan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feisal Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feisal Khan. The network helps show where Feisal Khan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Feisal Khan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Feisal Khan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Feisal Khan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Feisal Khan. Feisal Khan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Khan, Feisal. (2024). New Label, Same Vintage? Reassessing Participatory Islamic Banking in Pakistan. Journal of Economic Issues. 58(3). 852–870. 1 indexed citations
2.
Khan, Feisal. (2016). Combating corruption in Pakistan. Asian Education and Development Studies. 5(2). 195–210. 11 indexed citations
3.
Khan, Feisal. (2016). How not to control corruption, Pakistani style. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 1 indexed citations
4.
Khan, Feisal. (2015). Islamic Banking in Pakistan. 8 indexed citations
5.
Khan, Feisal. (2015). Islamic Banking in Pakistan: Shariah-Compliant Finance and the Quest to make Pakistan more Islamic. 4 indexed citations
6.
Khan, Feisal. (2011). The Development Economics Reader. Review of Social Economy. 69(2). 256–261. 1 indexed citations
7.
Khan, Feisal. (2010). Why Borrow Trouble for Yourself and Lend It to Neighbors? Understanding the Historical Roots of Pakistan's Afghan Policy. Asian Affairs An American Review. 37(4). 171–189. 3 indexed citations
8.
Khan, Feisal. (2010). How ‘Islamic’ is Islamic Banking?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 76(3). 805–820. 469 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Khan, Feisal. (2010). The limits of success? NGOs, microfinance and economic development in Pakistan's Northern Areas. Journal of Asian Public Policy. 3(1). 53–70. 1 indexed citations
11.
Khan, Feisal. (2008). Islamic Banking by Judiciary: The ‘Backdoor’ for Islamism in Pakistan?. South Asia Journal of South Asian Studies. 31(3). 535–555. 5 indexed citations
12.
Khan, Feisal. (2007). Corruption and the Decline of the State in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Political Science. 15(2). 219–247. 26 indexed citations
13.
Campos, Nauro F., et al.. (2004). From Substitution to Complementarity: Some Econometric Evidence on the Evolving NGO-State Relationship in Pakistan. ˜The œJournal of developing areas. 37(2). 49–72. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026