Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Intangible Cultural Heritage: The Living Culture of Peoples
Countries citing papers authored by Federico Lenzerini
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Federico Lenzerini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federico Lenzerini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federico Lenzerini more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Federico Lenzerini
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federico Lenzerini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federico Lenzerini. The network helps show where Federico Lenzerini may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Federico Lenzerini
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Federico Lenzerini.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Federico Lenzerini based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Federico Lenzerini. Federico Lenzerini is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lenzerini, Federico. (2018). Legal Implementation and International Cooperation and Assistance: Articles 37-42. Use Siena air (University of Siena). 539–572.1 indexed citations
Lenzerini, Federico. (2014). Protecting the Tangible, Safeguarding the Intangible: A Same Conventional Model for Different Needs. Use Siena air (University of Siena). 141–160.3 indexed citations
Lenzerini, Federico. (2012). Il principio del non-refoulement dopo la sentenza Hirsi della Corte europea dei diritti dell'uomo. Use Siena air (University of Siena). 95(3). 721–761.1 indexed citations
9.
Lenzerini, Federico, et al.. (2012). Cultural Heritage, Cultural Rights, Cultural Diversity. New Developments in International Law. Use Siena air (University of Siena). 4.11 indexed citations
10.
Lenzerini, Federico. (2010). The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Amending Five Centuries of Wrongs. Use Siena air (University of Siena). 19–28.1 indexed citations
Lenzerini, Federico. (2009). International Legal Instruments on Human Trafficking and a Victim-Oriented Approach: Which Gaps Are to Be Filled?. Use Siena air (University of Siena). 4. 205–238.
Francioni, Francesco & Federico Lenzerini. (2008). The Destruction of the Buddhas of Bamiyan and International Law. SSRN Electronic Journal.
16.
Lenzerini, Federico. (2008). Article 12. Protection of Properties Not Inscribed on the World Heritage List. Use Siena air (University of Siena). 201–218.4 indexed citations
17.
Lenzerini, Federico. (2006). Sovereignty Revisited: International Law and Parallel Sovereignty of Indigenous Peoples. Use Siena air (University of Siena). 42(1). 155–189.24 indexed citations
18.
Lenzerini, Federico. (2004). Asylum, Human Rights and State Measures Against Immigration Flows: State Prerogative or Disguised Refoulement?. Use Siena air (University of Siena). 11–33.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.