Feargus O'Connor

409 citations
11 papers · 306 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Feargus O'Connor

10 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers

Feargus O'Connor
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Soil Science 90
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 140
  • Ecology 142
  • Insect Science 36
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 27
Replace C. Gregoire-Wibo with:
C. Gregoire-Wibo Belgium
M M Da Gama Portugal
G. E. Gates United States
G. Howson United Kingdom
Maria Sterzyńska Poland
J. Schauermann Germany
Krassimira Ilieva‐Makulec Poland
Mónica Gutiérrez Spain
S. W. James United States
L. J. Thompson United Kingdom
Feargus O'Connor relative to C. Gregoire-Wibo Belgium C. Gregoire-Wibo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
C. Gregoire-Wibo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feargus O'Connor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feargus O'Connor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feargus O'Connor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feargus O'Connor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feargus O'Connor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feargus O'Connor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feargus O'Connor. The network helps show where Feargus O'Connor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Feargus O'Connor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feargus O'Connor Line = papers co-authored together Feargus O'Connor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1955187
2 195772
3 195819
4 19588
5 19635
6
The conservation and development programme for the UK. A response to the World Conservation Strategy.
19835
7 19813
8
A practical work on the management of small farms
19863
9 19763
10
Recreation pressures on the countryside. In: The Countryside Recreation Research Advisory Group Conference 1978, York University 20-21 September. Proceedings: Countryside for all? A review of the use people make of the countryside for recreation.
19781
11
The Labourer : a monthly magazine of politics, literature, poetry, &c.
20170

About Feargus O'Connor

Feargus O'Connor is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Social Psychology, Oceanography and Geometry and Topology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology (2 papers), Study of Mite Species (1 paper), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (1 paper), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (1 paper), Marine and coastal plant biology (1 paper), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (1 paper) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (90 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (140 citations), Ecology (142 citations), Insect Science (36 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (27 citations). Feargus O'Connor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bent T. Christensen. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Oikos, Landscape Research, Biological Conservation and Annals and Magazine of Natural History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact