F.C. Forrest
Impact in
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 10%
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes 1
- Co-authors
- Keith Postlethwaite (1 shared paper)Mark Tooley (4 shared papers)C D Florey (3 shared papers)Peter R. Saunders (2 shared papers)C. PRYS‐ROBERTS (2 shared papers)David Taylor (1 shared paper)F. M. McPherson (1 shared paper)Robert W. Johnson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Anaesthesia (2 papers)International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (1 paper)Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (1 paper)Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (1 paper)Eye (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
F.C. Forrest
15 papers receiving 258 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 57
- Family Practice 14
- Developmental Neuroscience 23
- Emergency Medical Services 34
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 17
Countries citing papers authored by F.C. Forrest
This map shows the geographic impact of F.C. Forrest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.C. Forrest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.C. Forrest more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F.C. Forrest
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.C. Forrest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.C. Forrest. The network helps show where F.C. Forrest may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside F.C. Forrest, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 87 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 50 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 41 | |
| 4 | High level simulators in medical education. | 1998 | 26 |
| 5 | 2001 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 16 | |
| 7 | Local and general anaesthesia for ophthalmic surgery | 1994 | 12 |
| 8 | 1992 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 1 |
About F.C. Forrest
F.C. Forrest is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Emergency Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (57 citations), Family Practice (14 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (23 citations), Emergency Medical Services (34 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (17 citations). F.C. Forrest has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Keith Postlethwaite, Mark Tooley, C D Florey, Peter R. Saunders, C. PRYS‐ROBERTS, David Taylor, F. M. McPherson, Robert W. Johnson, Jeremy P. Diamond and Edward Hughes. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare and Eye.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.