570 total citations 8 papers, 418 citations indexed
About
Fawcett Dw is a scholar working on Immunology, Parasitology and Surgery.
According to data from OpenAlex, Fawcett Dw has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 418 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Immunology, 2 papers in Parasitology and 1 paper in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Fawcett Dw's work include Vector-borne infectious diseases (2 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (2 papers) and Testicular diseases and treatments (1 paper). Fawcett Dw is often cited by papers focused on Vector-borne infectious diseases (2 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (2 papers) and Testicular diseases and treatments (1 paper). Fawcett Dw collaborates with scholars based in . Fawcett Dw's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as PubMed.
In The Last Decade
Fawcett Dw
8 papers
receiving
377 citations
Peers
Fawcett Dw
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
Reproductive Medicine191
Molecular Biology103
Parasitology76
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health64
This map shows the geographic impact of Fawcett Dw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fawcett Dw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fawcett Dw more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fawcett Dw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fawcett Dw. The network helps show where Fawcett Dw may publish in the future.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.