Fatma Charfi

494 citations
50 papers · 306 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Fatma Charfi

44 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Fatma Charfi
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 71
  • Social Psychology 62
  • Clinical Psychology 52
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 18
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 29
Replace Goodman Sibeko with:
Goodman Sibeko South Africa
Leyla Akoury Dirani Lebanon
Irmansyah Irmansyah Indonesia
Mahmood Heidari Iran
Philippa Carter New Zealand
Corentin J. Gosling France
Luís Fernando Silva Castro-de-Araujo Australia
Arianne N. Baanders Netherlands
Louise Pelletier Canada
Mathieu Goyette Canada
Fatma Charfi relative to Goodman Sibeko South Africa Goodman Sibeko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Goodman Sibeko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fatma Charfi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fatma Charfi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fatma Charfi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fatma Charfi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fatma Charfi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fatma Charfi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fatma Charfi. The network helps show where Fatma Charfi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fatma Charfi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fatma Charfi Line = papers co-authored together Fatma Charfi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201841
2 201738
3 201624
4 200417
5 200516
6 201216
7 201815
8 201715
9 201815
10 201911
11 20058
12 20057
13 20206
14 20215
15 20095
16 20175
17 20164
18 20194
19
Atopic dermatitis and mother-child interaction: a comparative study of 48 dyads.
20184
20 20204

About Fatma Charfi

Fatma Charfi is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 50 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (8 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (71 citations), Social Psychology (62 citations), Clinical Psychology (52 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (18 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (29 citations). Fatma Charfi has collaborated with scholars based in Tunisia, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include A. Belhadj, Jessica Spagnolo, S. Bourgou, Nicole Leduc, François Champagne, Myra Piat, Marc Laporta, Michèle Rivard, A Kechrid and H. Smaoui. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, L Encéphale, BMC Public Health, African Development Review and Archives of Suicide Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact