Fatma Çelik

36 papers receiving 441 citations

Peers

Fatma Çelik
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 39
  • Clinical Psychology 91
  • Infectious Diseases 80
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 76
  • Neurology 43
Replace I fan Kuo with:
I fan Kuo Canada
Miriam Casey Ireland
Beth Mittl United States
Carla Marienfeld United States
Hermelinda Cordeiro Pedrosa Brazil
Deepak Khandelwal India
Zhixin Zhang China
Conor P. Kerley Ireland
Luisa Gilardini Italy
Fatma Çelik relative to I fan Kuo Canada I fan Kuo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
I fan Kuo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fatma Çelik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fatma Çelik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fatma Çelik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fatma Çelik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fatma Çelik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fatma Çelik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fatma Çelik. The network helps show where Fatma Çelik may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fatma Çelik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fatma Çelik Line = papers co-authored together Fatma Çelik links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202160
2 202054
3
Neuroprotective effects of carvacrol and pomegranate against methotrexate-induced toxicity in rats.
201340
4 200635
5 202223
6 202023
7 202022
8 202222
9 201220
10 201820
11 202115
12 200315
13 202114
14
Determination of osteoporosis risk factors using a multiple logistic regression model in postmenopausal Turkish women.
200513
15 200712
16
Dietary antioxidant levels in hyperemesis gravidarum: a case control study.
201112
17 20219
18 20207
19 20086
20 20225

About Fatma Çelik

Fatma Çelik is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tea Polyphenols and Effects (3 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (3 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (3 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (2 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (2 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (39 citations), Clinical Psychology (91 citations), Infectious Diseases (80 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (76 citations) and Neurology (43 citations). Fatma Çelik has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Füsun Topçu, Mustafa Çalışkan, Adem Atıcı, Ömer Faruk Baycan, Tolga Sinan Güvenç, Mehmet Karadağ, Hasan Kandemır, Ahmet Büber, Tuba Mutluer and Zehra Topal. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Microvascular Research, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Journal of Diabetes and its Complications and Biomarker Insights.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact