Fátima Smith Erthal
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mirtes Garcia PereiraEliane VolchanLetícia OliveiraIzabela MocaiberLuiz PessoaWalter Machado‐PinheiroIsabel A. DavidMateus Joffily
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (11 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers)Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Fátima Smith Erthal
26 papers receiving 755 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Cognitive Neuroscience 421
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 273
- Clinical Psychology 178
- Social Psychology 143
- Psychiatry and Mental health 93
Countries citing papers authored by Fátima Smith Erthal
This map shows the geographic impact of Fátima Smith Erthal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fátima Smith Erthal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fátima Smith Erthal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fátima Smith Erthal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fátima Smith Erthal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fátima Smith Erthal. The network helps show where Fátima Smith Erthal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fátima Smith Erthal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fátima Smith Erthal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fátima Smith Erthal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fátima Smith Erthal. Fátima Smith Erthal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 54 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 69 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 160 |
About Fátima Smith Erthal
Fátima Smith Erthal is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 766 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (11 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (421 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (273 citations) and Applied Psychology (44 citations). Fátima Smith Erthal has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Mirtes Garcia Pereira, Eliane Volchan, Letícia Oliveira, Izabela Mocaiber, Luiz Pessoa, Walter Machado‐Pinheiro, Isabel A. David, Mateus Joffily, Ivan Figueira and Maurício Cagy. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Neuroscience and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.