Fati̇h Peker

36 total papers · 416 total citations
20 papers, 285 citations indexed

About

Fati̇h Peker is a scholar working on Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Fati̇h Peker has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 285 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 3 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Fati̇h Peker's work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (9 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (5 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers). Fati̇h Peker is often cited by papers focused on Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (9 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (5 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers). Fati̇h Peker collaborates with scholars based in Türkiye, Serbia and United States. Fati̇h Peker's co-authors include Fuat Yüksel, Bahattin Çeli̇köz, Ercan Karacaoğlu, Turgut Ortak, Namιk K. Baran, Cengiz Açıkel, Cihat Nazmi Baran, Ömer Şensöz, Mümtaz Güler and Ersi̇n Ülkür and has published in prestigious journals such as Burns, Annals of Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Fati̇h Peker

19 papers receiving 271 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Fati̇h Peker 229 84 49 40 34 20 285
Seyed Amir Hossein Javadi 79 0.3× 30 0.4× 35 0.7× 16 0.4× 36 1.1× 24 275
A. Griswold Bevin 249 1.1× 23 0.3× 37 0.8× 47 1.2× 18 0.5× 22 318
Patrick J. Buchanan 219 1.0× 52 0.6× 28 0.6× 48 1.2× 12 0.4× 17 321
N. Carver 198 0.9× 23 0.3× 58 1.2× 95 2.4× 37 1.1× 18 320
Ioannis A. Ignatiadis 227 1.0× 54 0.6× 59 1.2× 29 0.7× 38 1.1× 28 297
Davide Ciclamini 225 1.0× 103 1.2× 64 1.3× 24 0.6× 33 1.0× 35 285
Hayati Akbaş 213 0.9× 35 0.4× 5 0.1× 9 0.2× 16 0.5× 23 293
Asuman Tuncel 155 0.7× 22 0.3× 20 0.4× 11 0.3× 12 0.4× 15 228
I.M.R. Lowdon 174 0.8× 54 0.6× 99 2.0× 57 1.4× 23 0.7× 21 314
Christine Oh 228 1.0× 31 0.4× 8 0.2× 17 0.4× 60 1.8× 19 278

Countries citing papers authored by Fati̇h Peker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fati̇h Peker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fati̇h Peker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fati̇h Peker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fati̇h Peker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fati̇h Peker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fati̇h Peker. The network helps show where Fati̇h Peker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fati̇h Peker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fati̇h Peker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fati̇h Peker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fati̇h Peker. Fati̇h Peker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026