Faten Amer
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Economics and Econometrics
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Infectious Diseases
- Co-authors
- Haitham KhatatbehDavid OnchongaI BonczD. EndreiViktória PrémuszSzimonetta LohnerTariq Al‐DwaikatA. Oláh
- Topics
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (7 papers)Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers)COVID-19 epidemiological studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthBMC Health Services Research
- Partner nations
- HungaryPalestinian TerritoryJordan
In The Last Decade
Faten Amer
19 papers receiving 232 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- General Health Professions 117
- Clinical Psychology 51
- Economics and Econometrics 23
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 23
- Infectious Diseases 20
Countries citing papers authored by Faten Amer
This map shows the geographic impact of Faten Amer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Faten Amer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Faten Amer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Faten Amer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Faten Amer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Faten Amer. The network helps show where Faten Amer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Faten Amer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Faten Amer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Faten Amer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Faten Amer. Faten Amer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About Faten Amer
Faten Amer is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Modeling and Simulation and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (7 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers) and COVID-19 epidemiological studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (15 citations), Leadership and Management (11 citations) and General Health Professions (117 citations). Faten Amer has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Palestinian Territory and Jordan. Frequent co-authors include Haitham Khatatbeh, David Onchonga, I Boncz, D. Endrei, Viktória Prémusz, Szimonetta Lohner, Tariq Al‐Dwaikat, A. Oláh, A. Pakai and Béla Kocsis. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and BMC Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.