Farah Malick
About
In The Last Decade
Farah Malick
8 papers receiving 256 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Dermatology 187
- Immunology 115
- Epidemiology 84
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 67
- Clinical Psychology 40
Countries citing papers authored by Farah Malick
This map shows the geographic impact of Farah Malick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Farah Malick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Farah Malick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Farah Malick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Farah Malick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Farah Malick. The network helps show where Farah Malick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Farah Malick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Farah Malick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Farah Malick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Farah Malick. Farah Malick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | Towards rational treatment of severe psoriasis in alcoholics: report of two cases. | 9 |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 45 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 134 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.