Fang‐Ku P’eng

2.5k total citations
63 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Fang‐Ku P’eng is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Fang‐Ku P’eng has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Surgery, 25 papers in Oncology and 18 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Fang‐Ku P’eng's work include Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (14 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (12 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (12 papers). Fang‐Ku P’eng is often cited by papers focused on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (14 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (12 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (12 papers). Fang‐Ku P’eng collaborates with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Fang‐Ku P’eng's co-authors include Wing‐Yiu Lui, Chen‐Hsen Lee, Chew-Wun Wu, Ming Liu, Cheng‐Hsi Su, Tse‐Jia Liu, Cheng-Chung Wu, Dah‐Cherng Yeh, Chin‐Wen Chi and Cheng‐Chung Wu and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Gastroenterology and Molecular and Cellular Biology.

In The Last Decade

Fang‐Ku P’eng

63 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fang‐Ku P’eng Taiwan 25 1.0k 596 528 458 442 63 2.1k
Michel Scotté France 28 1.1k 1.1× 555 0.9× 636 1.2× 492 1.1× 279 0.6× 127 2.2k
S. Sottili Italy 17 480 0.5× 410 0.7× 289 0.5× 318 0.7× 363 0.8× 25 1.4k
James H. Grendell United States 29 2.2k 2.2× 566 0.9× 1.0k 2.0× 474 1.0× 798 1.8× 124 3.1k
William H. Marks United States 27 1.2k 1.2× 430 0.7× 338 0.6× 236 0.5× 363 0.8× 87 2.8k
Cynthia R. L. Webster United States 30 862 0.9× 474 0.8× 637 1.2× 505 1.1× 515 1.2× 79 2.2k
Claudio Avellini Italy 36 1.6k 1.6× 623 1.0× 503 1.0× 863 1.9× 1.2k 2.7× 115 3.7k
Marek Krawczyk Poland 28 1.4k 1.4× 378 0.6× 462 0.9× 1.3k 2.8× 781 1.8× 206 2.8k
B Portmann United Kingdom 35 1.2k 1.2× 500 0.8× 400 0.8× 1.9k 4.2× 1.6k 3.7× 83 3.6k
B. Wiebecke Germany 24 987 1.0× 360 0.6× 720 1.4× 681 1.5× 770 1.7× 80 2.6k
Guido Schumacher Germany 30 1.2k 1.2× 975 1.6× 815 1.5× 689 1.5× 341 0.8× 96 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Fang‐Ku P’eng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fang‐Ku P’eng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fang‐Ku P’eng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fang‐Ku P’eng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fang‐Ku P’eng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fang‐Ku P’eng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fang‐Ku P’eng. The network helps show where Fang‐Ku P’eng may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fang‐Ku P’eng

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fang‐Ku P’eng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fang‐Ku P’eng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fang‐Ku P’eng. Fang‐Ku P’eng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Wu, Cheng-Chung, et al.. (2021). Colo-pancreaticoduodenectomy for locally advanced colon carcinoma—feasibility in patients presenting with acute abdomen. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 16(1). 7–7. 6 indexed citations
3.
Shen, Ching‐Hui, Jen-I Hwang, Hong‐Zen Yeh, et al.. (2019). Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in oldest old patients. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 17(1). 1–1. 34 indexed citations
4.
Lin, Hui‐Chen, Chieh‐Lin Jerry Teng, Ching‐Hui Shen, et al.. (2017). Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hematological malignancies. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 15(1). 194–194. 1 indexed citations
5.
Cheng, Shao‐Bin, et al.. (2016). Embedding fistulojejunostomy: An easy and secure technique for refractory external pancreatic fistula. Asian Journal of Surgery. 41(2). 143–147. 3 indexed citations
6.
Yeh, Dah‐Cherng, Shao‐Bin Cheng, William‐Lin Ho, et al.. (2006). Role of Glucocorticoid Receptor in Serosa-Involved Gastric Carcinoma After Gastrectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 10(5). 706–711. 3 indexed citations
7.
Wu, Cheng‐Chung, Shao‐Bin Cheng, Wai‐Meng Ho, et al.. (2004). Appraisal of concomitant splenectomy in liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with hypersplenic thrombocytopenia. Surgery. 136(3). 660–668. 44 indexed citations
8.
Hsieh, Shih‐Rong, et al.. (2003). Surgical treatment for carcinoma of the suprahepatic inferior vena cava. Surgery. 133(3). 342–344. 4 indexed citations
9.
Yeh, Dah‐Cherng, Cheng‐Chung Wu, Wai‐Meng Ho, et al.. (2003). Bacterial translocation after cirrhotic liver resection: a clinical investigation of 181 patients. Journal of Surgical Research. 111(2). 209–214. 34 indexed citations
10.
Ho, William‐Lin, Cheng‐Chung Wu, Dah‐Cherng Yeh, et al.. (2002). Roles of the glucocorticoid receptor in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery. 131(1). 19–25. 11 indexed citations
11.
Yeh, Dah‐Cherng, Cheng-Chung Wu, Tse‐Jia Liu, & Fang‐Ku P’eng. (2001). Management of acute pancreatitis: results of a 15-year experience in Taiwan. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. 8(3). 204–210. 4 indexed citations
12.
Hsieh, Mao-Chih, et al.. (1997). Prognostic Indicators for Survival After Curative Resection for Patients with Carcinoma of the Stomach. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 42(6). 1265–1269. 56 indexed citations
13.
Chang, Yuh-Fang, Chew-Wun Wu, Tsung‐Yun Liu, et al.. (1996). Paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in human gastric carcinoma cell lines. Cancer. 77(1). 14–18. 84 indexed citations
14.
Wu, Chew-Wun, et al.. (1996). Tissue potassium, selenium, and iron levels associated with gastric cancer progression. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 41(1). 119–125. 19 indexed citations
15.
Wu, Chew-Wun, et al.. (1994). Effect of arginase on splenic killer cell activity in patients with gastric cancer. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 39(5). 1107–1112. 12 indexed citations
16.
Su, Cheng‐Hsi, Wing‐Yiu Lui, & Fang‐Ku P’eng. (1992). Relative prevalence of gallstone diseases in Taiwan. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 37(5). 764–768. 83 indexed citations
17.
P’eng, Fang‐Ku, et al.. (1992). The nontransformed progesterone and estrogen receptors in gastric cancer. Gastroenterology. 102(5). 1639–1646. 20 indexed citations
18.
Wu, Chew-Wun, Soo-Ray Wang, Shi-Long Lian, et al.. (1992). Regulation of arginase production by glucocorticoid in three human gastric cancer cell lines. Life Sciences. 51(17). 1355–1361. 10 indexed citations
19.
P’eng, Fang‐Ku, Chew-Wun Wu, Tai-Jay Chang, & Wing‐Yiu Lui. (1989). A comparison of regional versus systemic drug injection. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. 23(6). 363–366. 3 indexed citations
20.
Lee, Chen‐Hsen, et al.. (1986). Carcinoid tumor of the pancreas causing the diarrheogenic syndrome: report of a case combined with multiple endocrine neoplasia, type I.. PubMed. 99(1). 123–9. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026