Faith‐Anne Dohm
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Pharmacy top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ruth H. Striegel‐MooreDenise E. WilfleyKathleen M. PikeChristopher G. FairburnHelena C. KraemerStephen R. DanielsGeorge B. SchreiberVicki Garvin
- Topics
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors (25 papers)Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (13 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (10 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of PsychiatryJournal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Faith‐Anne Dohm
34 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Clinical Psychology 1.1k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 432
- Pharmacy 218
- Sociology and Political Science 180
- Social Psychology 131
Countries citing papers authored by Faith‐Anne Dohm
This map shows the geographic impact of Faith‐Anne Dohm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Faith‐Anne Dohm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Faith‐Anne Dohm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Faith‐Anne Dohm
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Faith‐Anne Dohm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Faith‐Anne Dohm. The network helps show where Faith‐Anne Dohm may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Faith‐Anne Dohm
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Faith‐Anne Dohm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Faith‐Anne Dohm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Faith‐Anne Dohm. Faith‐Anne Dohm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | |
| 2 | 54 | |
| 3 | 46 | |
| 4 | 50 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 137 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 119 | |
| 17 | 104 | |
| 18 | 69 | |
| 19 | 42 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Faith‐Anne Dohm
Faith‐Anne Dohm is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (25 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (13 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Pharmacy (218 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (432 citations). Faith‐Anne Dohm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ruth H. Striegel‐Moore, Denise E. Wilfley, Kathleen M. Pike, Christopher G. Fairburn, Helena C. Kraemer, Stephen R. Daniels, George B. Schreiber, Vicki Garvin, Patricia B. Crawford and Fary M. Cachelin. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.