Faisal Adhami
About
In The Last Decade
Faisal Adhami
8 papers receiving 669 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Molecular Biology 282
- Epidemiology 267
- Neurology 126
- Insect Science 84
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 79
Countries citing papers authored by Faisal Adhami
This map shows the geographic impact of Faisal Adhami's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Faisal Adhami with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Faisal Adhami more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Faisal Adhami
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Faisal Adhami. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Faisal Adhami. The network helps show where Faisal Adhami may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Faisal Adhami
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Faisal Adhami. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Faisal Adhami based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Faisal Adhami. Faisal Adhami is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 54 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 94 | |
| 6 | 72 | |
| 7 | 301 | |
| 8 | 121 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.