Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Review of current and future softwood kraft lignin process chemistry
2004929 citationsFadi S. Chakar, Arthur J. RagauskasIndustrial Crops and Productsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Fadi S. Chakar
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Fadi S. Chakar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fadi S. Chakar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fadi S. Chakar more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fadi S. Chakar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fadi S. Chakar. The network helps show where Fadi S. Chakar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fadi S. Chakar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fadi S. Chakar.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fadi S. Chakar based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Fadi S. Chakar. Fadi S. Chakar is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Chakar, Fadi S. & Arthur J. Ragauskas. (2004). Review of current and future softwood kraft lignin process chemistry. Industrial Crops and Products. 20(2). 131–141.929 indexed citations breakdown →
Chakar, Fadi S., Lucian A. Lucia, & Arthur J. Ragauskas. (2000). Extending the limits of oxygen delignification. SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology).6 indexed citations
Chakar, Fadi S., Arthur J. Ragauskas, & Thomas Joseph McDonough. (2000). Laccase-mediator systems and oxygen delignification --a comparative study. SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology).2 indexed citations
8.
Kim, Dongho, et al.. (2000). The path forward to practical nascent laccase biobleaching technologies. SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
9.
Chakar, Fadi S. & Arthur J. Ragauskas. (2000). Laccase-lignin reactions. SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
10.
McDonough, Thomas Joseph, et al.. (2000). Evaluation of hexenuronic acids in U.S. kraft pulps. SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
11.
Chakar, Fadi S., et al.. (1999). Influence of hexenuronic acids on US bleaching operations. TAPPI Journal. 83(11).12 indexed citations
12.
Chakar, Fadi S. & Arthur J. Ragauskas. (1999). Fundamental investigation of laccase mediator delignification. on high lignin content kraft pulps. SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology).4 indexed citations
13.
Chakar, Fadi S., Arthur J. Ragauskas, & Nils‐Olof Nilvebrant. (1998). Biobleaching of high lignin content kraft pulps via laccase-mediator systems. SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology).6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.