Fabrice Monti
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Molecular Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michel CloîtreLudwik LeiblerRégis BorregaPatrick TabelingJean‐Claude ManuguerraPierre GarneretJessica VanhomwegenCamille Escadafal
- Topics
- Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (8 papers)Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (6 papers)Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Fabrice Monti
29 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Biomedical Engineering 597
- Materials Chemistry 386
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 230
- Molecular Biology 169
- Molecular Medicine 132
Countries citing papers authored by Fabrice Monti
This map shows the geographic impact of Fabrice Monti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fabrice Monti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fabrice Monti more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fabrice Monti
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fabrice Monti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fabrice Monti. The network helps show where Fabrice Monti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fabrice Monti
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fabrice Monti. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fabrice Monti based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fabrice Monti. Fabrice Monti is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 37 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 103 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 106 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 105 | |
| 17 | 54 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 73 | |
| 20 | 177 |
About Fabrice Monti
Fabrice Monti is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Molecular Medicine and Surfaces, Coatings and Films, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (8 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (6 papers) and Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (230 citations), Molecular Medicine (132 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (597 citations). Fabrice Monti has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michel Cloître, Ludwik Leibler, Régis Borrega, Patrick Tabeling, Patrick Tabeling, Jean‐Claude Manuguerra, Pierre Garneret, Jessica Vanhomwegen, Camille Escadafal and Pierre Lafaye. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Physical Review Letters and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.