Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee—second edition
2021190 citationsJosé Fernando Pacheco, Luís Fábio Silveira et al.Työväentutkimus Vuosikirjaprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Fábio Olmos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fábio Olmos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fábio Olmos more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fábio Olmos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fábio Olmos. The network helps show where Fábio Olmos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fábio Olmos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fábio Olmos.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fábio Olmos based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Fábio Olmos. Fábio Olmos is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pacheco, José Fernando, Luís Fábio Silveira, Alexandre Luis Padovan Aleixo, et al.. (2021). Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee—second edition. Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja. 29(2). 94–105.190 indexed citations breakdown →
Olmos, Fábio, et al.. (2014). First record of Corncrake Crex crex (Rallidae) for South America. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia. 21(53). 4.4 indexed citations
7.
Olmos, Fábio, et al.. (2013). First documented record of Grey Kingbird, Tyrannus dominicensis (Passeriformes: Tyrannidae) in Brazil.. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia. 21(52). 3.1 indexed citations
Pacheco, José Fernando, et al.. (2012). Primeiros registros do maçarico-grande-de-perna-amarela, Tringa melanoleuca (Gmelin, 1789), (Charadriiformes: Scolopacidae) no estado do Tocantins. 5(1). 36–38.
10.
Pacheco, José Fernando, et al.. (2011). Revisão da distribuição do vite-vite-de-cabeça-cinza Hylophilus pectoralis (Passeriformes: Vireonidae), com notificação de sua ocorrência no Triângulo Mineiro e noroeste de São Paulo. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).1 indexed citations
11.
Olmos, Fábio. (2005). Aves ameacadas, prioridades e politicas de conservacao no Brasil. Natureza & Conservação. 3(1). 21–146.33 indexed citations
Olmos, Fábio. (1996). Satiation or deception ? : mast - seeding chusquea bamboos , birds and rats in the atlantic forest. Revista Brasileira de Biologia. 56(2). 391–401.26 indexed citations
Olmos, Fábio, et al.. (1993). Seed dispersal by tapir in southeastern Brazil. Mammalia. 57(3). 460–461.35 indexed citations
20.
Olmos, Fábio. (1993). Notes on the food habits of Brazilian Caatinga' carnivores. Mammalia. 57(1). 126–130.47 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.