Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Cooperative Approach to Particle Swarm Optimization
20041.6k citationsF. van den Bergh, Andries P. Engelbrechtprofile →
A study of particle swarm optimization particle trajectories
20051.0k citationsF. van den Bergh, Andries P. EngelbrechtInformation Sciencesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by F. van den Bergh
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of F. van den Bergh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. van den Bergh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. van den Bergh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. van den Bergh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. van den Bergh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. van den Bergh. The network helps show where F. van den Bergh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. van den Bergh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. van den Bergh.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. van den Bergh based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with F. van den Bergh. F. van den Bergh is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Viallefont-Robinet, Françoise, et al.. (2018). Comparaison de mesures de FTM par bord de plage : vers un jeu de données de référence. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).19 indexed citations
Bergh, F. van den, et al.. (2009). Comparison of data file and storage configurations for efficient temporal access of satellite image data. South African Computer Journal. 43. 66–74.2 indexed citations
Wyk, Barend Jacobus van, et al.. (2008). Robust fitting of diurnal brightness temperature cycles : pattern recognition special edition. South African Computer Journal. 2008(40). 31–36.3 indexed citations
Bergh, F. van den, et al.. (2008). Efficient temporal access of satellite image data.1 indexed citations
16.
Bergh, F. van den, et al.. (2006). Comparison of canny and V1 neural network based edge detectors applied to road extraction.
17.
Bergh, F. van den & Andries P. Engelbrecht. (2005). A study of particle swarm optimization particle trajectories. Information Sciences. 176(8). 937–971.1042 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Bergh, F. van den & Andries P. Engelbrecht. (2001). Effects of swarm size on Cooperative Particle Swarm Optimisers. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. 892–899.63 indexed citations
19.
Bergh, F. van den & Andries P. Engelbrecht. (2000). Cooperative learning in neural networks using particle swarm optimizers. South African Computer Journal. 26(26). 84–90.226 indexed citations
20.
Bergh, F. van den, et al.. (1999). Software chroma keying in an immersive virtual environment. South African Computer Journal.17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.