This map shows the geographic impact of F. Scaltriti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Scaltriti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Scaltriti more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Scaltriti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Scaltriti. The network helps show where F. Scaltriti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Scaltriti
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Scaltriti.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Scaltriti based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with F. Scaltriti. F. Scaltriti is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Scaltriti, F., et al.. (1993). UBV RI linear and circular polarization of RS CVn-type binaries. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 102(2). 343–360.2 indexed citations
6.
Scaltriti, F., et al.. (1989). The UBVRI photopolarimeter of the Torino Astronomical Observatory. MmSAI. 60. 243–246.4 indexed citations
Scaltriti, F., M. Busso, & A. Cellino. (1985). Some Comments on the Minima of the RS CVn Type Eclipsing Binaries CQ Aur, RU Cnc, VV Mon and SZ Psc. IBVS. 2841. 1.1 indexed citations
Cerruti-Sola, M., L. Milano, & F. Scaltriti. (1981). BB Peg : a W UMa-W system with a high degree of overcontact.. A&A. 101. 273–275.2 indexed citations
11.
Cerruti-Sola, M. & F. Scaltriti. (1980). Two-color photoelectric observations of the eclipsing binary BB Peg.. 40. 85–89.2 indexed citations
12.
Schober, H. J., F. Scaltriti, V. Zappalà, & Alan W. Harris. (1980). The remaining large minor planets with unknown rotational properties - 31 Euphrosyne and 65 Cybele. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 91. 1–6.8 indexed citations
13.
Scaltriti, F. & V. Zappalà. (1980). The similarity of the opposition effect among asteroids. 83. 249–251.10 indexed citations
14.
Scaltriti, F.. (1979). Photoelectric variations of three RS CVn-type eclipsing binaries: VV Mon, CQ Aur and RU Cnc.. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 35. 291–300.2 indexed citations
15.
Schober, H. J., F. Scaltriti, & V. Zappalà. (1979). Photoelectric photometry and rotation periods of three large and dark asteroids: 49 Pales, 88 Thisbe and 92 Undina.. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 36. 1.9 indexed citations
16.
Scaltriti, F., et al.. (1977). A photometric research on the eclipsing binary RU UMi.. 27. 187–193.1 indexed citations
17.
Scaltriti, F. & V. Zappalà. (1977). Photoelectric photometry of the minor planets 41 Daphne and 129 Antigone.. A&A. 56. 7–11.11 indexed citations
18.
Scaltriti, F. & V. Zappalà. (1977). Rotation period of the asteroid 52 Europa. 30. 169.4 indexed citations
19.
Scaltriti, F. & V. Zappalà. (1976). A photometric study of the minor planets 192 Nausikaa and 79 Eurynome.. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 23. 167–179.12 indexed citations
20.
Scaltriti, F. & V. Zappalà. (1975). A photometric study of the minor planet 15 Eunomia.. 19. 249–255.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.