F. S. Cooper

16 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

Perception of the speech code.1967202619862006196750010001.5k2.0k

Peers

F. S. Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.0k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 791
  • Artificial Intelligence 681
  • Signal Processing 483
Replace Ignatius G. Mattingly with:
Ignatius G. Mattingly United States
Randy L. Diehl United States
Betty Tuller United States
Lynne C. Nygaard United States
Philip E. Rubin United States
Franklin S. Cooper United States
Jean‐Luc Schwartz France
Robert E. Remez United States
Francisco Lacerda Sweden
Paul Iverson United Kingdom
F. S. Cooper relative to Ignatius G. Mattingly United States Ignatius G. Mattingly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ignatius G. Mattingly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. S. Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. S. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. S. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. S. Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. S. Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. S. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. S. Cooper. The network helps show where F. S. Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. S. Cooper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. S. Cooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. S. Cooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. S. Cooper. F. S. Cooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 4
3
INFLAMMATIONN AND ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE
1
4 2
5 47
6 6
7 22
8 15
9 6
10
Perception of the speech code.breakdown →
2370
11 3
12 26
13 0
14 49
15 157
16 13
17 68
18 1
19
Effect of exposure to hog cholera virus before and after vaccination with modified live vaccine.
1
20 2

About F. S. Cooper

F. S. Cooper is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Signal Processing, having authored 20 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (10 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (4 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.0k citations), Linguistics and Language (461 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (791 citations). F. S. Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Iraq. Frequent co-authors include Alvin M. Liberman, Donald Shankweiler, Michael Studdert‐Kennedy, Pierre Delattre, Leigh Lisker, John D. O’Connor, Louis J. Gerstman, Frances Ingemann, Antoine Berman and Masayuki Sawashima. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Review, Proceedings of the IEEE and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026