F. Richard Keene
- Oncology top 0.5%
- Organic Chemistry top 0.5%
- Materials Chemistry top 2%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 1%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Deanna M. D’AlessandroJ. Grant CollinsThomas J. MeyerPeter AndersonFangfei LiTodd J. RutherfordJayden A. SmithGraeme H. Searle
- Topics
- Metal complexes synthesis and properties (127 papers)Magnetism in coordination complexes (35 papers)DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (33 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
F. Richard Keene
189 papers receiving 7.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Oncology 4.1k
- Organic Chemistry 3.5k
- Materials Chemistry 2.3k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.7k
- Inorganic Chemistry 1.7k
Countries citing papers authored by F. Richard Keene
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Richard Keene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Richard Keene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Richard Keene more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. Richard Keene
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Richard Keene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Richard Keene. The network helps show where F. Richard Keene may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Richard Keene
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Richard Keene. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Richard Keene based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Richard Keene. F. Richard Keene is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 66 | |
| 10 | 117 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 60 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 115 | |
| 20 | ビス(ジエチレントリアミン)コバルト(III)陽イオンの異性体 環境パラメータに対する平衡異性体比の依存性 | 38 |
About F. Richard Keene
F. Richard Keene is a scholar working on Oncology, Electrochemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 191 papers that have together received 7.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal complexes synthesis and properties (127 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (35 papers) and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (33 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (4.1k citations), Organic Chemistry (3.5k citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (1.7k citations). F. Richard Keene has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Deanna M. D’Alessandro, J. Grant Collins, Thomas J. Meyer, Peter Anderson, Fangfei Li, Todd J. Rutherford, Jayden A. Smith, Graeme H. Searle, Joseph A. Treadway and Geoffrey F. Strouse. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Reviews, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Chemical Society Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.