Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoid contents of some selected Iranian medicinal plants
2006805 citationsF. Pourmorad, Seyed Jalal Hosseinimehr et al.AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGYprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Pourmorad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Pourmorad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Pourmorad more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Pourmorad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Pourmorad. The network helps show where F. Pourmorad may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Pourmorad
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Pourmorad.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Pourmorad based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with F. Pourmorad. F. Pourmorad is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chabra, Aroona, et al.. (2012). Preparation of chitosan from Penicillium spp. and determination of their degree of deacetylation. Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 7(5). 477.12 indexed citations
Ebrahimzadeh, Mohammad Ali, S F Nabavi, S M Nabavi, & F. Pourmorad. (2010). Nitric oxide radical scavenging potential of some Elburz medicinal plants. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY. 9(32). 5212–5217.67 indexed citations
Pourmorad, F., et al.. (2009). Nanodispersion of quercetin and ferulic acid. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and Phenomena. 27(3). 1583–1585.2 indexed citations
Ebrahimzadeh, Mohammad Ali, et al.. (2008). Antioxidant Activities of Iranian Corn Silk. TURKISH JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY. 32(1). 43–49.253 indexed citations
12.
Pourmorad, F., et al.. (2007). Antinociception and locomotor impairment induction by methanolic extract of Urtica dioica. International journal of biology and biotechnology.2 indexed citations
Mahmoudi, Maryam Tayefeh, et al.. (2006). Anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive properties of fractionated extracts in different parts of Sambucus ebulus. Majallah-i dānishgāh-i ̒ulūm-i pizishkī-i Māzandarān/Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 16(54). 35–42.4 indexed citations
16.
Pourmorad, F., et al.. (2006). Antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoid contents of some selected Iranian medicinal plants. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY. 5(11). 1142–1145.805 indexed citations breakdown →
Pourmorad, F., et al.. (2003). Comparison between polarography and titrimetry methods for determination of ascorbic acid in pharmaceutical dosage forms.. PubMed. 142(7). 295–7.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.