Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Determinants of Prognosis in Survivors of Myocardial Infarction
1982444 citationsG Sánz, Angel Castañer et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by F Navarro-López
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of F Navarro-López's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F Navarro-López with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F Navarro-López more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F Navarro-López. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F Navarro-López. The network helps show where F Navarro-López may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F Navarro-López
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F Navarro-López.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F Navarro-López based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with F Navarro-López. F Navarro-López is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Navarro-López, F, et al.. (1999). [Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Informe del Grupo de Trabajo de Insuficiencia Carddiacade la Sociedad Espanñola de Cardiología].. PubMed. 52 Suppl 2. 1–54.2 indexed citations
6.
Terradellas, Josep Brugada, et al.. (1998). TRATAMIENTO DE ARRITMIAS CARDIACAS CON RADIOFRECUENCIA EN PEDIATRIA. Anales de Pediatría. 48(4). 385–388.2 indexed citations
7.
Navarro-López, F, et al.. (1998). [Treatment of cardiac arrhythmia with radiofrequency in pediatrics].. PubMed. 48(4). 385–8.3 indexed citations
8.
Brugada, Josép, et al.. (1996). [One thousand consecutive radiofrequency ablation procedures. Indications, results, and complications].. PubMed. 49(11). 810–4.9 indexed citations
9.
Brugada, Josép, et al.. (1994). [Radiofrequency ablation of the slow nodal pathway in cases of paroxysmal nodal reentry tachycardia].. PubMed. 47(4). 240–6.1 indexed citations
10.
Ball, Steven & F Navarro-López. (1993). The role of ACE inhibition in heart failure and atherosclerosis : proceedings of a satellite symposium held during the XIVth European Society of Cardiology Congress in Barcelona, September 2, 1992, sponsored by HOECHST AG. Raven Press eBooks.2 indexed citations
Bosch, Xavier & F Navarro-López. (1990). [Prehospital thrombolysis. Bases for its application and possibilities for its administration in Spain].. PubMed. 43(1). 1–5.13 indexed citations
Sánz, G, Angel Castañer, Amadeo Betriu, et al.. (1982). Determinants of Prognosis in Survivors of Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. 306(18). 1065–1070.444 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Sánz, G, J Magriñá, Joseph Coll, et al.. (1981). [Functional capacity and working status after myocardial infarction].. PubMed. 34(3). 219–26.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.