F. J. Lerch

2.4k total citations
50 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

F. J. Lerch is a scholar working on Oceanography, Aerospace Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, F. J. Lerch has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 48 papers in Oceanography, 26 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 22 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in F. J. Lerch's work include Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (47 papers), GNSS positioning and interference (20 papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (16 papers). F. J. Lerch is often cited by papers focused on Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (47 papers), GNSS positioning and interference (20 papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (16 papers). F. J. Lerch collaborates with scholars based in United States. F. J. Lerch's co-authors include C. A. Wagner, S. M. Klosko, G. B. Patel, R. G. Williamson, J. G. Marsh, Steven M. Klosko, R. S. Nerem, J. A. Richardson, B. H. Putney and J. W. Robbins and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Geophysical Research Letters and IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

In The Last Decade

F. J. Lerch

44 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F. J. Lerch United States 20 1.3k 650 602 396 357 50 1.8k
C. A. Wagner United States 20 1.2k 1.0× 645 1.0× 589 1.0× 423 1.1× 266 0.7× 119 1.6k
R. G. Williamson United States 21 1.5k 1.2× 750 1.2× 683 1.1× 369 0.9× 306 0.9× 64 2.0k
S. M. Klosko United States 24 2.1k 1.6× 930 1.4× 897 1.5× 583 1.5× 440 1.2× 66 2.6k
R. J. Eanes United States 25 1.7k 1.3× 768 1.2× 886 1.5× 496 1.3× 458 1.3× 61 2.3k
J. G. Marsh United States 24 1.5k 1.2× 485 0.7× 351 0.6× 274 0.7× 333 0.9× 98 2.1k
Richard H. Rapp United States 25 2.0k 1.6× 926 1.4× 375 0.6× 650 1.6× 563 1.6× 97 2.4k
Reiner Rummel Germany 27 1.7k 1.3× 828 1.3× 515 0.9× 809 2.0× 504 1.4× 96 2.0k
B. H. Putney United States 11 772 0.6× 393 0.6× 376 0.6× 165 0.4× 168 0.5× 19 1.0k
R. S. Gross United States 29 1.7k 1.3× 556 0.9× 783 1.3× 682 1.7× 477 1.3× 105 2.2k
C. C. Tscherning Denmark 20 1.6k 1.3× 846 1.3× 256 0.4× 674 1.7× 578 1.6× 54 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by F. J. Lerch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. J. Lerch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. J. Lerch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. J. Lerch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. J. Lerch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. J. Lerch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. J. Lerch. The network helps show where F. J. Lerch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. J. Lerch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. J. Lerch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. J. Lerch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. J. Lerch. F. J. Lerch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lemoine, F. G., David E. Smith, F. J. Lerch, M. T. Zuber, & G. B. Patel. (1994). Progress in the development of the GMM-2 gravity field model for Mars. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 11. 789–169. 2 indexed citations
2.
Lerch, F. J., et al.. (1994). Ocean dynamic topography from satellite altimetry based on the GEM-T3 geopotential model. Manuscripta geodetica.. 19(6). 346–366. 4 indexed citations
3.
Lerch, F. J., R. S. Nerem, B. H. Putney, et al.. (1994). A geopotential model from satellite tracking, altimeter, and surface gravity data: GEM‐T3. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 99(B2). 2815–2839. 46 indexed citations
4.
Nerem, R. S., F. J. Lerch, R. G. Williamson, et al.. (1994). Gravity model improvement using the DORIS tracking system on the SPOT 2 satellite. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 99(B2). 2791–2813. 19 indexed citations
5.
Lerch, F. J., R. S. Nerem, D. S. Chinn, et al.. (1993). New error calibration tests for gravity models using subset solutions and independent data: Applied to GEM‐T3. Geophysical Research Letters. 20(3). 249–252. 11 indexed citations
6.
Zuber, M. T., David E. Smith, F. J. Lerch, et al.. (1991). A 40th deg and order gravitational field model for Mars. 22. 1581. 1 indexed citations
7.
Lerch, F. J., G. B. Patel, & S. M. Klosko. (1991). Direct calibration of GEM-T1 with 1071 5° × 5° mean gravity anomalies from altimetry. Manuscripta geodetica.. 16(3). 141–147. 2 indexed citations
8.
Marsh, J. G., C. J. Koblinsky, F. J. Lerch, et al.. (1990). Dynamic sea surface topography, gravity, and improved orbit accuracies from the direct evaluation of Seasat altimeter data. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 95(C8). 13129–13150. 59 indexed citations
9.
Smith, David E., F. J. Lerch, J. C. Chan, et al.. (1990). Mars gravity field error analysis from simulated radio tracking of Mars Observer. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 95(B9). 14155–14167. 10 indexed citations
10.
Lerch, F. J.. (1989). Optimum data weighting and error calibration for estimation of gravitational parameters. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 1 indexed citations
11.
Marsh, J. G., F. J. Lerch, B. H. Putney, et al.. (1989). The GEM-T2 gravitational model.. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 29 indexed citations
12.
Marsh, J. G., F. J. Lerch, B. H. Putney, et al.. (1989). Gravitational model improvement at the Goddard Space Flight Center. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 3. 1 indexed citations
13.
Marsh, J. G., F. J. Lerch, B. H. Putney, et al.. (1988). A new gravitational model for the Earth from satellite tracking data: GEM‐T1. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 93(B6). 6169–6215. 147 indexed citations
14.
Lerch, F. J., S. M. Klosko, G. B. Patel, & C. A. Wagner. (1985). A gravity model for crustal dynamics (GEM‐L2). Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 90(B11). 9301–9311. 51 indexed citations
15.
Lerch, F. J., S. M. Klosko, & G. B. Patel. (1983). A refined gravity model from Lageos (GEM-L2). Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 7 indexed citations
16.
Lerch, F. J., et al.. (1977). Gravity model improvement using GEOS-3 (GEM 9 and 10). Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 17 indexed citations
17.
Wagner, C. A., et al.. (1977). Improvement in the geopotential derived from satellite and surface data (GEM 7 and 8). Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 82(5). 901–914. 109 indexed citations
18.
Lerch, F. J., et al.. (1974). Goddard Earth Models 5 and 6. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 361. 238. 30 indexed citations
19.
Marsh, J. G., et al.. (1973). The geoid and free air gravity anomalies corresponding to the GEM-4 earth gravitational model. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2 indexed citations
20.
Lerch, F. J., et al.. (1972). Gravitational field models for the earth (GEM 1 and 2). NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026