F. Hammache

3.1k total citations
40 papers, 408 citations indexed

About

F. Hammache is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Hammache has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 408 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 18 papers in Radiation and 13 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in F. Hammache's work include Nuclear physics research studies (31 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (16 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (9 papers). F. Hammache is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (31 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (16 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (9 papers). F. Hammache collaborates with scholars based in France, Algeria and Italy. F. Hammache's co-authors include J. Kiener, V. Tatischeff, A. Coc, J. P. Thibaud, A. Lefébvre, C. Angulo, N. de Séréville, S. Barhoumi, J. F. Chemin and M. Hussonnois and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Nuclear Physics A.

In The Last Decade

F. Hammache

34 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F. Hammache France 10 357 125 111 52 40 40 408
N. de Séréville France 15 296 0.8× 106 0.8× 189 1.7× 147 2.8× 40 1.0× 49 454
I. Licot Belgium 11 264 0.7× 105 0.8× 139 1.3× 44 0.8× 58 1.4× 18 302
H. Costantini Italy 6 265 0.7× 118 0.9× 90 0.8× 60 1.2× 35 0.9× 17 303
N. L. Achouri France 10 219 0.6× 101 0.8× 102 0.9× 43 0.8× 25 0.6× 23 280
T. G. Tornyi Norway 10 450 1.3× 129 1.0× 127 1.1× 58 1.1× 54 1.4× 24 489
R. Chatterjee India 13 324 0.9× 83 0.7× 143 1.3× 24 0.5× 47 1.2× 43 337
B. DiGiovine United States 10 198 0.6× 89 0.7× 151 1.4× 22 0.4× 79 2.0× 26 278
G. G. Rapisarda Italy 14 410 1.1× 192 1.5× 110 1.0× 55 1.1× 80 2.0× 55 463
C. Matei United States 10 240 0.7× 88 0.7× 191 1.7× 26 0.5× 62 1.6× 49 371
J. Vincour Czechia 8 298 0.8× 144 1.2× 69 0.6× 36 0.7× 44 1.1× 20 331

Countries citing papers authored by F. Hammache

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Hammache's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Hammache with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Hammache more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Hammache

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Hammache. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Hammache. The network helps show where F. Hammache may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Hammache

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Hammache. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Hammache based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Hammache. F. Hammache is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hammache, F., P. Adsley, L. Lamia, et al.. (2024). Experimental Determination of α Widths of Ne21 Levels in the Region of Astrophysical Interest: New O17+α Reaction Rates and Impact on the Weak s Process. Physical Review Letters. 132(18). 182701–182701. 1 indexed citations
2.
Séréville, N. de, P. Adsley, F. Hammache, et al.. (2022). Experimental study of the Si30(He3,d)P31 reaction and thermonuclear reaction rate of Si30(p,γ)P31. Physical review. C. 105(1). 3 indexed citations
3.
Shrivastava, A., K. Mahata, I. Stefan, et al.. (2022). Occupation probabilities of valence orbitals relevant to neutrinoless double β decay of Sn124. Physical review. C. 105(1).
4.
Kiener, J., J. Bundesmann, I. Deloncle, et al.. (2021). γ-ray emission in α-particle interactions with C, Mg, Si, and Fe at Eα=5090 MeV. Physical review. C. 104(2). 1 indexed citations
5.
Meyer, A., N. de Séréville, A. M. Laird, et al.. (2020). Evaluation of the N13(α,p)O16 thermonuclear reaction rate and its impact on the isotopic composition of supernova grains. Physical review. C. 102(3). 5 indexed citations
6.
Chabot, M., K. Béroff, Néstor F. Aguirre, et al.. (2018). Semiempirical breakdown curves of C2N(+) and C3N(+) molecules; application to products branching ratios predictions of physical and chemical processes involving these adducts. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 12. 25–32. 2 indexed citations
7.
Adsley, P., T. Faestermann, S. P. Fox, et al.. (2018). High-resolution study of levels in the astrophysically important nucleus Mg26 and resulting updated level assignments. Physical review. C. 97(4). 10 indexed citations
8.
Courtin, S., D. G. Jenkins, M. Heine, et al.. (2017). Fusion cross section measurements of astrophysical interest for light heavy ions systems within the STELLA project. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 163. 18–18.
9.
Fellah, M., et al.. (2015). Particle-number conservation in quasiparticle representation in the isovector neutron–proton pairing case. International Journal of Modern Physics E. 24(12). 1550097–1550097. 5 indexed citations
10.
Allal, N. H., et al.. (2015). Isovector particle-number projection approach in quasiparticle representation. AIP conference proceedings. 1653. 20011–20011. 2 indexed citations
11.
Dueñas, J. A., D. Mengoni, M. Assié, et al.. (2014). Interstrip effects influence on the particle identification of highly segmented silicon strip detector in a nuclear reaction scenario. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 743. 44–50. 8 indexed citations
12.
Hammache, F., N. H. Allal, & M. Fellah. (2010). ISOVECTOR NEUTRON-PROTON PAIRING EFFECT ON ODD NUCLEI. 358–361. 1 indexed citations
13.
Séréville, N. de, C. Angulo, A. Coc, et al.. (2010). Reply to “Comment on ‘Low-energyF18(p,α)O15cross section measurements relevant to novaγ-rayemission’ ”. Physical Review C. 81(3).
14.
Séréville, N. de, C. Angulo, A. Coc, et al.. (2009). Low-energyF18(p,α)O15cross section measurements relevant to novaγ-ray emission. Physical Review C. 79(1). 16 indexed citations
15.
Kiener, J., A. Coc, J. Duprat, et al.. (2007). γ-ray production by proton and α-particle induced reactions onC12,O16,Mg24, and Fe. Physical Review C. 76(3). 23 indexed citations
16.
Verney, D., F. Ibrahim, C. Bourgeois, et al.. (2007). Low-energy states of3181Ga50: Proton structure of the nuclei close toNi78. Physical Review C. 76(5). 23 indexed citations
17.
Tatischeff, V., J. Duprat, J. Kiener, et al.. (2003). Cross sections relevant toγ-ray line emission in solar flares:3He-induced reactions on16Onuclei. Physical Review C. 68(2). 7 indexed citations
18.
Hammache, F., G. Bogaert, P. Aguer, et al.. (2001). The solar neutrino problem: Low energy measurements of the 7Be(p,γ)8B cross section. Nuclear Physics A. 688(1-2). 273–276. 2 indexed citations
19.
Hammache, F., G. Bogaert, P. Aguer, et al.. (2001). Low-Energy Measurement of theB7e(p,γ)B8Cross Section. Physical Review Letters. 86(18). 3985–3988. 71 indexed citations
20.
Hammache, F., G. Bogaert, P. Aguer, et al.. (1998). New Measurement and Analysis of theB7e(p,γ)B8Cross Section. Physical Review Letters. 80(5). 928–931. 81 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026