F. de Felice
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 2%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Oceanography top 10%
- Co-authors
- M. CalvaniChris ClarkeDonato BiniFrancesco SorgeK. P. TodM. CrostaAlberto VecchiatoA. Čadež
- Topics
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (55 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (47 papers)Relativity and Gravitational Theory (35 papers)
- Journals
- NatureSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Astrophysical Journal
In The Last Decade
F. de Felice
110 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.5k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 776
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 296
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 202
- Oceanography 111
Countries citing papers authored by F. de Felice
This map shows the geographic impact of F. de Felice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. de Felice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. de Felice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. de Felice
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. de Felice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. de Felice. The network helps show where F. de Felice may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. de Felice
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. de Felice. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. de Felice based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. de Felice. F. de Felice is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | GENERAL RELATIVISTIC SATELLITE ASTROMETRY. I. A NON-PERTURBATIVE APPROACH TO DATA REDUCTION | 10 |
| 14 | Detecting accretion disks in active galactic nuclei. | 2 |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | Angular momentum loss during the formation of elliptical galaxies | 0 |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | Contributed papers : 10th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation, Padua, 4-9 July, 1983 | 1 |
| 19 | 73 | |
| 20 | The Kerr metric and its astrophysical consequences | 1 |
About F. de Felice
F. de Felice is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Oceanography, having authored 117 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (55 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (47 papers) and Relativity and Gravitational Theory (35 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.5k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (776 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (296 citations). F. de Felice has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include M. Calvani, Chris Clarke, Donato Bini, Francesco Sorge, K. P. Tod, M. Crosta, Alberto Vecchiato, A. Čadež, M. G. Lattanzi and B. Bucciarelli. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.