F. David Hoeniger

539 total citations
23 papers, 165 citations indexed

About

F. David Hoeniger is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics and Museology. According to data from OpenAlex, F. David Hoeniger has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 165 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 2 papers in Classics and 2 papers in Museology. Recurrent topics in F. David Hoeniger's work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (6 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers) and History of Medicine Studies (2 papers). F. David Hoeniger is often cited by papers focused on Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (6 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers) and History of Medicine Studies (2 papers). F. David Hoeniger collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United States. F. David Hoeniger's co-authors include Allen G. Debus, Nancy G. Siraisi, G. E. Bentley, Judith F. M. Hoeniger, Robert Weimann and P. G. Edwards and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, The Modern Language Review and Shakespeare Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

F. David Hoeniger

16 papers receiving 112 citations

Peers

F. David Hoeniger
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • History 46
  • History and Philosophy of Science 35
  • Literature and Literary Theory 27
  • Sociology and Political Science 22
  • Anthropology 21
Replace Charles S. Singleton with:
Charles S. Singleton
Lynette Hunter United States
Eckhard Keßler Germany
Norma E. Emerton
Penelope Gouk United Kingdom
Ernst Benz Germany
Raymond Klibansky Canada
Park Honan United Kingdom
Aby Warburg
Earl R. Wasserman
Charles S. Singleton View profile →
Citations per field, relative to F. David Hoeniger
F. David Hoeniger · 1×
Citations per year, relative to F. David Hoeniger
F. David Hoeniger · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by F. David Hoeniger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. David Hoeniger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. David Hoeniger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. David Hoeniger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. David Hoeniger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. David Hoeniger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. David Hoeniger. The network helps show where F. David Hoeniger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. David Hoeniger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. David Hoeniger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. David Hoeniger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. David Hoeniger. F. David Hoeniger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 6
2 10
3
The New Cambridge Shakespeare: 'Pericles, Prince of Tyre' ed. by Doreen DelVecchio, Antony Hammond (review)
2
4 4
5 9
6
Birds with Human Souls: A Guide to Bird Symbolism by Beryl Rowland (review)
0
7 10
8
The development of natural history in Tudor England
1
9 38
10 41
11 3
12 1
13 3
14 0
15 0
16 9
17 1
18 0
19 0
20 1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026