F D Mundim
About
In The Last Decade
F D Mundim
5 papers receiving 286 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 218
- Clinical Psychology 158
- Psychiatry and Mental health 72
- Pharmacology 65
- Cognitive Neuroscience 38
Countries citing papers authored by F D Mundim
This map shows the geographic impact of F D Mundim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F D Mundim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F D Mundim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F D Mundim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F D Mundim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F D Mundim. The network helps show where F D Mundim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F D Mundim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F D Mundim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F D Mundim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F D Mundim. F D Mundim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 66 | |
| 2 | 237 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | A double-blind comparison between loxapine and chlordiazepoxide in the treatment of neurotic anxiety. | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.