Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Defining Opportunistic Invasive Fungal Infections in Immunocompromised Patients with Cancer and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplants: An International Consensus
20021.9k citationsF. Crokaert, Dominik Selleslag et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Crokaert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Crokaert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Crokaert more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Crokaert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Crokaert. The network helps show where F. Crokaert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Crokaert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Crokaert.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Crokaert based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with F. Crokaert. F. Crokaert is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Herbrecht, Raoul, M P Blanc-Vincent, Christine Fuhrmann, et al.. (2000). Standards, Options et Recommandations (SOR) pour la surveillance et la prévention des infections nosocomiales en cancérologie. Bulletin du Cancer. 87(7).5 indexed citations
7.
Herbrecht, Raoul, M P Blanc-Vincent, Christine Fuhrmann, et al.. (2000). Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR)for the surveillance and the prevention of cross infections in oncology. Bulletin du Cancer. 87(7).1 indexed citations
Yourassowsky, E., et al.. (1989). Bactericidal activity of LY-163892, a new cephalosporin, against beta-lactamase-producing strains of Haemophilus influenzae compared with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Current Therapeutic Research. 45(5). 902–906.1 indexed citations
Glupczynski, Y., F. Crokaert, Martial Van der Linden, & E. Yourassowsky. (1985). Activity of cefsulodin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Current Therapeutic Research. 37(3). 467–471.1 indexed citations
18.
Yourassowsky, E., et al.. (1982). Growth curve patterns of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa exposed to different cefsulodin concentrations. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 10(11). 853–854.1 indexed citations
19.
Yourassowsky, E., et al.. (1982). Antibacterial activity of M.K. 0366 against multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens and Haemophilus influenzae. Current Therapeutic Research. 32. 36–39.3 indexed citations
20.
Yourassowsky, E., et al.. (1980). The antimicrobial activity of the cephalosporin CGP 7174/E against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in comparison to carbenicillin, piperacillin and cefotaxime. Current Therapeutic Research. 28(2). 203–207.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.