F. Cervero
- Physiology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- G.J. BennettP.M. HeadleyJ. H. WolstencroftVolker NeugebauerHans‐Georg SchaibleRobert F. SchmidtA. IggoV. Molony
- Topics
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (11 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers)Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
F. Cervero
21 papers receiving 900 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Physiology 732
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 415
- Molecular Biology 170
- Pharmacology 160
- Cognitive Neuroscience 157
Countries citing papers authored by F. Cervero
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Cervero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Cervero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Cervero more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. Cervero
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Cervero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Cervero. The network helps show where F. Cervero may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Cervero
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Cervero. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Cervero based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Cervero. F. Cervero is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 144 | |
| 2 | 170 | |
| 3 | 47 | |
| 4 | 82 | |
| 5 | 41 | |
| 6 | 81 | |
| 7 | 51 | |
| 8 | 93 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 63 | |
| 14 | 48 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | Descending influences on neurones in the substantia gelatinosa Rolandi of the cat [proceedings]. | 1 |
| 18 | Effects of cutaneous stimulation on neurones in the substantia gelatinosa Rolandi of the cat [proceedings]. | 0 |
| 19 | Reciprocal sensory interaction in the spinal cord [proceedings]. | 1 |
| 20 | Effects of noxious stimulation of the skin on transmission through the spinocervical tract [proceedings]. | 1 |
About F. Cervero
F. Cervero is a scholar working on Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, having authored 23 papers that have together received 948 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (732 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (415 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (70 citations). F. Cervero has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include G.J. Bennett, P.M. Headley, J. H. Wolstencroft, Volker Neugebauer, Hans‐Georg Schaible, Robert F. Schmidt, A. Iggo, V. Molony, Bridget M. Lumb and John E.H. Tattersall. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Journal of Neurophysiology and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.