F. Carranza

626 total citations
7 papers, 386 citations indexed

About

F. Carranza is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Carranza has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 386 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 2 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 2 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in F. Carranza's work include Ovarian function and disorders (5 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (2 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers). F. Carranza is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian function and disorders (5 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (2 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers). F. Carranza collaborates with scholars based in Spain and Argentina. F. Carranza's co-authors include Manuel Fernández Sánchez, António Pellicer, Eva Gómez, Carlos Simón, Patricia Díaz-Gimeno, Maria Ruíz-Alonso, David Blesa, Felipe Vilella, Isabel Rodrı́guez and Antonio González and has published in prestigious journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Journal of Clinical Medicine and Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences.

In The Last Decade

F. Carranza

7 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
F. Carranza Spain	5	307	301	187	122	59	7	386
C.O. Perfetto United States	4	202 0.7×	152 0.5×	136 0.7×	102 0.8×	81 1.4×	8	282
L.L. Engmann United States	8	258 0.8×	369 1.2×	237 1.3×	150 1.2×	101 1.7×	14	458
Cynthia Simon France	8	197 0.6×	359 1.2×	283 1.5×	59 0.5×	110 1.9×	10	412
Inge Van Vaerenbergh Belgium	10	217 0.7×	452 1.5×	367 2.0×	53 0.4×	176 3.0×	16	518
A Hazout France	5	139 0.5×	236 0.8×	215 1.1×	54 0.4×	105 1.8×	17	328
H.-C. Liu United States	7	137 0.4×	276 0.9×	198 1.1×	71 0.6×	73 1.2×	16	366
David Kreiner United States	14	228 0.7×	512 1.7×	338 1.8×	127 1.0×	137 2.3×	22	584
Chow‐Seng Kong United Kingdom	6	292 1.0×	201 0.7×	84 0.4×	148 1.2×	34 0.6×	11	321
K. Beier-Hellwig Germany	10	242 0.8×	222 0.7×	120 0.6×	82 0.7×	26 0.4×	16	325
Almudena Devesa-Peiró Spain	8	168 0.5×	179 0.6×	75 0.4×	134 1.1×	40 0.7×	13	267

Countries citing papers authored by F. Carranza

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Carranza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Carranza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Carranza more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Carranza

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Carranza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Carranza. The network helps show where F. Carranza may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Carranza

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Carranza. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Carranza based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Carranza. F. Carranza is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Carranza, F., et al.. (2021). Diagnostic Accuracy Study Comparing Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography and Hysterosalpingography for Fallopian Tube Patency Assessment. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 10(18). 4169–4169. 8 indexed citations

2.

Sánchez, Manuel Fernández, et al.. (2018). Different endometrial receptivity in each hemiuterus of a woman with uterus didelphys and previous failed embryo transfers. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 11(3). 297–297. 7 indexed citations

3.

Carranza, F., et al.. (2014). Influence of follicle rupture and uterine contractions on intrauterine insemination outcome: a new predictive model. Fertility and Sterility. 102(4). 1034–1040. 10 indexed citations

4.

Ruíz-Alonso, Maria, David Blesa, Patricia Díaz-Gimeno, et al.. (2013). The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertility and Sterility. 100(3). 818–824. 350 indexed citations

5.

Rodrı́guez, Isabel, et al.. (2007). Prospective randomized study to compare frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles outcome in women with functioning ovaries and hrt for endometrium preparation with or without prior GnRHa suppression. Fertility and Sterility. 88. S114–S115. 7 indexed citations

6.

Carranza, F., et al.. (2007). Prospective randomized study to compare use of daily vs. depot GnRH analogue in endometrial preparation for oocyte donations cycles in recipients. Fertility and Sterility. 88. S261–S261. 2 indexed citations

7.

Carranza, F., et al.. (2007). Luteal phase support in IVF patients at low risk for OHSS: progesterone vs. progesterone plus hCG. A prospective randomized study. Fertility and Sterility. 88. S163–S163. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact