F. C. Wellstood

6.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
160 papers, 4.8k citations indexed

About

F. C. Wellstood is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, F. C. Wellstood has authored 160 papers receiving a total of 4.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 119 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 89 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 50 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in F. C. Wellstood's work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (89 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (65 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (36 papers). F. C. Wellstood is often cited by papers focused on Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (89 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (65 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (36 papers). F. C. Wellstood collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Singapore. F. C. Wellstood's co-authors include John Clarke, C. Urbina, J. J. Kingston, J. R. Anderson, A. Amar, C. J. Lobb, R. C. Black, Alex J. Dragt, Frederick W. Strauch and M. J. Ferrari and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Physical Review Letters.

In The Last Decade

F. C. Wellstood

156 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Hit Papers

Hot-electron effects in metals 1994 2026 2004 2015 1994 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F. C. Wellstood United States 38 3.2k 2.1k 1.3k 1.1k 662 160 4.8k
David P. Pappas United States 34 3.7k 1.2× 1.4k 0.7× 1.5k 1.2× 991 0.9× 247 0.4× 125 4.6k
M. Siegel Germany 35 2.6k 0.8× 2.4k 1.1× 707 0.5× 1.7k 1.5× 619 0.9× 259 4.6k
R. H. Koch United States 42 3.0k 1.0× 3.8k 1.8× 452 0.4× 1.2k 1.1× 530 0.8× 131 5.7k
G. Müller Germany 25 1.6k 0.5× 1.4k 0.7× 725 0.6× 850 0.8× 672 1.0× 166 3.2k
Doyeol Ahn South Korea 32 3.0k 0.9× 1.1k 0.5× 874 0.7× 1.6k 1.4× 529 0.8× 249 4.2k
Peiheng Wu China 40 2.3k 0.7× 1.5k 0.7× 593 0.5× 2.9k 2.6× 1.2k 1.8× 411 6.4k
H.‐G. Meyer Germany 33 2.3k 0.7× 716 0.3× 963 0.7× 1.1k 1.0× 289 0.4× 176 3.4k
Tero T. Heikkilä Finland 34 3.7k 1.2× 1.8k 0.9× 512 0.4× 941 0.8× 162 0.2× 120 4.6k
D. E. Prober United States 26 1.9k 0.6× 1.5k 0.7× 286 0.2× 1.3k 1.2× 439 0.7× 133 3.5k
J. R. Tucker United States 33 3.2k 1.0× 1.0k 0.5× 265 0.2× 2.8k 2.5× 624 0.9× 111 5.0k

Countries citing papers authored by F. C. Wellstood

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. C. Wellstood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. C. Wellstood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. C. Wellstood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. C. Wellstood

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. C. Wellstood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. C. Wellstood. The network helps show where F. C. Wellstood may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. C. Wellstood

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. C. Wellstood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. C. Wellstood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. C. Wellstood. F. C. Wellstood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Wang, H., et al.. (2023). Identification and mitigation of conducting package losses for quantum superconducting devices. Applied Physics Letters. 123(4). 1 indexed citations
3.
Dutta, S. K., et al.. (2023). Characterization of Asymmetric Gap-Engineered Josephson Junctions and 3D Transmon Qubits. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 33(5). 1–5. 2 indexed citations
4.
Yeh, Jen-Hao, et al.. (2019). Hot electron heatsinks for microwave attenuators below 100 mK. Applied Physics Letters. 114(15). 5 indexed citations
5.
Burin, Alexander L., et al.. (2016). Projected Dipole Moments of Individual Two-Level Defects Extracted Using Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics. Physical Review Letters. 116(16). 167002–167002. 45 indexed citations
6.
Birenbaum, Jeffrey, S. R. O’Kelley, Vladimir Bolkhovsky, et al.. (2013). Magnetic Flux Noise in dc SQUIDs: Temperature and Geometry Dependence. Physical Review Letters. 110(14). 147002–147002. 75 indexed citations
7.
Rolston, S. L., J. R. Anderson, Jeffrey A. Grover, et al.. (2013). A hybrid quantum system of atoms trapped on ultrathin optical fibers coupled to superconductors. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8875. 88750L–88750L. 1 indexed citations
8.
Suri, Baladitya, S P Novikov, Kevin Osborn, et al.. (2011). Decoupling a Cooper-Pair Box to Enhance the Lifetime to 0.2 ms. Physical Review Letters. 106(12). 120501–120501. 56 indexed citations
9.
Harry, Gregory, et al.. (2008). Two-stage superconducting-quantum-interference-device amplifier in a high-Q gravitational wave transducer. 8 indexed citations
10.
Xu, Huizhong, Frederick W. Strauch, S. K. Dutta, et al.. (2005). Spectroscopy of Three-Particle Entanglement in a Macroscopic Superconducting Circuit. Physical Review Letters. 94(2). 27003–27003. 45 indexed citations
11.
Paik, Hanhee, Frederick W. Strauch, Roberto Ramos, et al.. (2005). Cooper-Pair Box as a Variable Capacitor. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 15(2). 884–887. 6 indexed citations
12.
Strauch, Frederick W., Philip R. Johnson, Alex J. Dragt, et al.. (2003). Quantum Logic Gates for Coupled Superconducting Phase Qubits. Physical Review Letters. 91(16). 167005–167005. 144 indexed citations
13.
Johnson, Philip R., Frederick W. Strauch, Alex J. Dragt, et al.. (2003). Spectroscopy of capacitively coupled Josephson-junction qubits. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 67(2). 43 indexed citations
14.
Takeuchi, Ichiro, J.C. Read, Maria A. Aronova, et al.. (2003). Identification of novel compositions of ferromagnetic shape-memory alloys using composition spreads. Nature Materials. 2(3). 180–184. 212 indexed citations
15.
Anlage, Steven M., D. E. Steinhauer, C. P. Vlahacos, et al.. (1998). Near-Field Scanning Microwave Microscopy. APS. 6 indexed citations
16.
Dutta, S. K., C. P. Vlahacos, D. E. Steinhauer, et al.. (1998). Imaging of Active Microwave Devices at Cryogenic Temperatures using Scanning Near-Field Microwave Microscopy. APS. 1 indexed citations
17.
De, Song, A. Amar, C. J. Lobb, & F. C. Wellstood. (1995). Advantages of superconducting Coulomb-blockade electrometers. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 5(2). 3085–3089. 24 indexed citations
18.
Johnson, Mark W., M. J. Ferrari, F. C. Wellstood, et al.. (1990). Random telegraph signals in high-temperature superconductors. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 42(16). 10792–10795. 15 indexed citations
19.
Wellstood, F. C.. (1988). Excess Noise in the dc SQUID; 4.2K to 20 mK. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 4 indexed citations
20.
Wellstood, F. C., C. Urbina, & John Clarke. (1987). Excess noise in dc SQUIDs from 4.2K to 0.022K. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 23(2). 1662–1665. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026