F. C. T. Moore

610 total citations
5 papers, 279 citations indexed

About

F. C. T. Moore is a scholar working on General Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, F. C. T. Moore has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 279 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in General Psychology, 1 paper in History and Philosophy of Science and 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in F. C. T. Moore's work include Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper) and Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (1 paper). F. C. T. Moore is often cited by papers focused on Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper) and Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (1 paper). F. C. T. Moore collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Hong Kong. F. C. T. Moore's co-authors include Claude Lévi‐Strauss, Rodney Needham, Sebastian Gardner, Peter Simons, David Bakhurst, Margaret Schabas, Christopher Adair‐Toteff, Thomas Baldwin, Michael Hallett and Gary Hatfield and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ, History Australia and Cambridge University Press eBooks.

In The Last Decade

F. C. T. Moore

3 papers receiving 168 citations

Peers

F. C. T. Moore
Judith Hamera United States
Mette Hjort Hong Kong
Anya Peterson Royce United States
Herman Roodenburg Netherlands
Robert M. Levine United States
Nadia Tazi France
Claire R. Farrer United States
Christine Battersby United Kingdom
Judith Hamera United States
F. C. T. Moore
Citations per year, relative to F. C. T. Moore F. C. T. Moore (= 1×) peers Judith Hamera

Countries citing papers authored by F. C. T. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. C. T. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. C. T. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. C. T. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. C. T. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. C. T. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. C. T. Moore. The network helps show where F. C. T. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. C. T. Moore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. C. T. Moore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. C. T. Moore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. C. T. Moore. F. C. T. Moore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
1.
Linton, Stephen & F. C. T. Moore. (2025). Arthur David MacAdam. BMJ. 389. r1044–r1044.
2.
3.
Baldwin, Thomas, Rom Harré, Christopher Adair‐Toteff, et al.. (2003). The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 24 indexed citations
4.
Moore, F. C. T.. (1996). Bergson. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 26 indexed citations
5.
Moore, F. C. T., et al.. (1969). The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Man. 4(4). 660–660. 229 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026