F. C. Schoebel
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Nephrology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Thomas JaxMatthias LeschkeBodo E. StrauerB. E. StrauerPeter HeeringM. P. HeintzenKatrin IvensB. Grabensee
- Topics
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (11 papers)Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (10 papers)Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyBelgiumUnited States
In The Last Decade
F. C. Schoebel
39 papers receiving 515 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 264
- Surgery 259
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 192
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 130
- Nephrology 82
Countries citing papers authored by F. C. Schoebel
This map shows the geographic impact of F. C. Schoebel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. C. Schoebel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. C. Schoebel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. C. Schoebel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. C. Schoebel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. C. Schoebel. The network helps show where F. C. Schoebel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. C. Schoebel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. C. Schoebel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. C. Schoebel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. C. Schoebel. F. C. Schoebel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 95 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 74 | |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | [Conservative treatment concepts for stable angina pectoris in coronary heart disease]. | 0 |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About F. C. Schoebel
F. C. Schoebel is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 45 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (11 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (10 papers) and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (62 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (264 citations) and Nephrology (82 citations). F. C. Schoebel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Jax, Matthias Leschke, Bodo E. Strauer, B. E. Strauer, Peter Heering, M. P. Heintzen, Katrin Ivens, B. Grabensee, Malte Kelm and B. Grabensee. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Kidney International and European Heart Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.