F. Block

1.4k total citations
8 papers, 28 citations indexed

About

F. Block is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Artificial Intelligence and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Block has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 28 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 2 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in F. Block's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (6 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (3 papers) and Computational Physics and Python Applications (3 papers). F. Block is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (6 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (3 papers) and Computational Physics and Python Applications (3 papers). F. Block collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Italy. F. Block's co-authors include L. Cifarelli, A. Jayakumar, Clark S. Lindsey, Th. Lindblad, C. D’Ambrosio, T. Gys, P. Langefeld, F. Anselmo, K. H. Becks and Marcos Mariño and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Journal of Russian Laser Research and CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

In The Last Decade

F. Block

7 papers receiving 27 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
F. Block Germany	4	19	11	6	5	3	8	28
A. Wegner Germany	2	21 1.1×	13 1.2×	7 1.2×	4 0.8×	5 1.7×	2	38
T. Krämerkämper Germany	3	22 1.2×	15 1.4×	3 0.5×	3 0.6×	5 1.7×	4	32
W. Fröchtenicht Germany	3	23 1.2×	15 1.4×	3 0.5×	3 0.6×	5 1.7×	5	33
D. Goldner Germany	3	23 1.2×	16 1.5×	3 0.5×	3 0.6×	5 1.7×	6	35
T. M. Liss United States	3	35 1.8×	4 0.4×	6 1.0×	7 1.4×	6 2.0×	5	39
T. Kobler Germany	2	22 1.2×	15 1.4×	2 0.3×	3 0.6×	5 1.7×	4	31
C. Baldanza Italy	5	20 1.1×	18 1.6×	5 0.8×	9 1.8×	5 1.7×	11	31
A. Sidoti Italy	3	16 0.8×	5 0.5×	5 0.8×	5 1.0×	2 0.7×	11	20
G. Gagliardi Italy	3	17 0.9×	4 0.4×	8 1.3×	5 1.0×	5 1.7×	4	22
J. D. Lewis United States	4	23 1.2×	5 0.5×	7 1.2×	13 2.6×	1 0.3×	9	32

Countries citing papers authored by F. Block

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Block's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Block with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Block more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Block

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Block. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Block. The network helps show where F. Block may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Block

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Block. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Block based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Block. F. Block is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Block, F., et al.. (1999). Lens effect in the waveguide gas laser. Journal of Russian Laser Research. 20(4). 386–398.

Lindblad, Th., Clark S. Lindsey, F. Block, & A. Jayakumar. (1995). Using software and hardware neural networks in a Higgs search. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 356(2-3). 498–506. 7 indexed citations

Anselmo, F., F. Block, L. Cifarelli, et al.. (1994). Heavy higgs search with hadron supercolliders up to √s=200 TeV. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 107(5). 783–806. 1 indexed citations

Hatzifotiadou, D., F. Block, L. Cifarelli, et al.. (1994). A large area RICH for long baseline neutrinos. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations

Anselmo, F., F. Block, L. Cifarelli, et al.. (1994). Track reconstruction with a central two-shell scintillating fibre tracker (SFT). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 349(2-3). 398–406. 5 indexed citations

Anselmo, F., et al.. (1994). Neural networks for Higgs search. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 107(1). 129–141. 5 indexed citations

Becks, K. H., et al.. (1993). B-quark tagging using neural networks and multivariate statistical methods A comparison of both techniques. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 329(3). 501–517. 7 indexed citations

Block, F., et al.. (1967). PROGRESS REPORT ON THE CERN-PS LINAC.. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact