F. A. Miles

7.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
74 papers, 5.5k citations indexed

About

F. A. Miles is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, F. A. Miles has authored 74 papers receiving a total of 5.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 59 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 33 papers in Ophthalmology and 29 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in F. A. Miles's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (58 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (33 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (29 papers). F. A. Miles is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (58 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (33 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (29 papers). F. A. Miles collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and France. F. A. Miles's co-authors include S. G. Lisberger, C. Busettini, James H. Fuller, David J. Braitman, K. Kawano, Richard J. Krauzlis, Josh Wallman, Urs Schwarz, Bruce M. Dow and Lance M. Optican and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

F. A. Miles

72 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Hit Papers

Plasticity in the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex: A New Hypothesis 1981 2026 1996 2011 1981 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F. A. Miles United States 39 3.7k 2.6k 1.6k 927 893 74 5.5k
Lance M. Optican United States 42 4.9k 1.3× 2.4k 0.9× 935 0.6× 993 1.1× 829 0.9× 140 7.1k
S. G. Lisberger United States 31 3.1k 0.8× 3.1k 1.2× 1.3k 0.8× 974 1.1× 812 0.9× 37 5.1k
H. Collewijn Netherlands 52 5.3k 1.4× 3.5k 1.3× 2.4k 1.5× 1.7k 1.8× 1.7k 1.9× 138 9.0k
Stephen G. Lisberger United States 54 6.2k 1.7× 3.3k 1.3× 1.3k 0.8× 730 0.8× 1.4k 1.6× 145 8.4k
Louis F. Dell’Osso United States 34 1.5k 0.4× 2.6k 1.0× 1.0k 0.6× 1.1k 1.2× 808 0.9× 138 4.0k
Ronald J. Tusa United States 39 2.4k 0.6× 3.0k 1.1× 1.0k 0.6× 1.5k 1.6× 997 1.1× 90 6.1k
Tutis Vilis Canada 41 3.9k 1.1× 1.8k 0.7× 820 0.5× 1.1k 1.2× 272 0.3× 88 5.5k
Theodore Raphan United States 44 2.6k 0.7× 4.4k 1.7× 1.1k 0.7× 2.2k 2.4× 465 0.5× 149 6.4k
Peter Thier Germany 48 5.1k 1.4× 2.0k 0.8× 596 0.4× 364 0.4× 1.1k 1.2× 164 6.9k
Kikuro Fukushima Japan 38 2.6k 0.7× 2.5k 0.9× 920 0.6× 892 1.0× 755 0.8× 165 4.9k

Countries citing papers authored by F. A. Miles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. A. Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. A. Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. A. Miles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. A. Miles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. A. Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. A. Miles. The network helps show where F. A. Miles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. A. Miles

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. A. Miles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. A. Miles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. A. Miles. F. A. Miles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rambold, H., B. M. Sheliga, & F. A. Miles. (2010). Evidence from vergence eye movements that disparities defined by luminance and contrast are sensed by independent mechanisms. Journal of Vision. 10(14). 31–31. 6 indexed citations
2.
Rambold, H. & F. A. Miles. (2008). Human vergence eye movements to oblique disparity stimuli: Evidence for an anisotropy favoring horizontal disparities. Vision Research. 48(19). 2006–2019. 12 indexed citations
3.
Matsuura, Katsuhisa, Kenichiro Miura, Masato Taki, et al.. (2008). Ocular following responses of monkeys to the competing motions of two sinusoidal gratings. Neuroscience Research. 61(1). 56–69. 16 indexed citations
4.
Sheliga, B. M., et al.. (2007). The vergence eye movements induced by radial optic flow: Some fundamental properties of the underlying local-motion detectors. Vision Research. 47(20). 2637–2660. 14 indexed citations
5.
Sheliga, B. M., et al.. (2006). Human ocular following initiated by competing image motions: Evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism. Vision Research. 46(13). 2041–2060. 34 indexed citations
6.
Sheliga, B. M., Edmond J. FitzGibbon, & F. A. Miles. (2006). Short-latency disparity vergence eye movements: A response to disparity energy. Vision Research. 46(21). 3723–3740. 16 indexed citations
7.
Miura, Kenichiro, et al.. (2005). The visual motion detectors underlying ocular following responses in monkeys. Vision Research. 46(6-7). 869–878. 37 indexed citations
8.
Sheliga, B. M., et al.. (2005). Initial ocular following in humans: A response to first-order motion energy. Vision Research. 45(25-26). 3307–3321. 73 indexed citations
9.
Sheliga, B. M., et al.. (2005). Short‐Latency Disparity Vergence in Humans: Evidence for Early Spatial Filtering. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1039(1). 252–259. 9 indexed citations
10.
Sheliga, B. M., et al.. (2005). The initial ocular following responses elicited by apparent-motion stimuli: Reversal by inter-stimulus intervals. Vision Research. 46(6-7). 979–992. 32 indexed citations
11.
Sheliga, B. M., et al.. (2005). Initial Ocular Following in Humans Depends Critically on the Fourier Components of the Motion Stimulus. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1039(1). 260–271. 18 indexed citations
12.
Yang, Dongsheng & F. A. Miles. (2003). Short-latency ocular following in humans is dependent on absolute (rather than relative) binocular disparity. Vision Research. 43(12). 1387–1396. 17 indexed citations
13.
Takemura, Aya, K. Kawano, Christian Quaia, & F. A. Miles. (2002). Population Coding in Cortical Area MST. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 956(1). 284–296. 13 indexed citations
14.
Masson, Guillaume S., et al.. (2002). Reversed short-latency ocular following. Vision Research. 42(17). 2081–2087. 27 indexed citations
15.
Sheliga, B. M., Valerie J. Brown, & F. A. Miles. (2002). Voluntary saccadic eye movements in humans studied with a double-cue paradigm. Vision Research. 42(15). 1897–1915. 8 indexed citations
16.
Masson, Guillaume S., C. Busettini, Dongsheng Yang, & F. A. Miles. (2001). Short-latency ocular following in humans: sensitivity to binocular disparity. Vision Research. 41(25-26). 3371–3387. 40 indexed citations
17.
Busettini, C., et al.. (1997). Radial optic flow induces vergence eye movements with ultra-short latencies. Nature. 390(6659). 512–515. 73 indexed citations
18.
Krauzlis, Richard J. & F. A. Miles. (1996). Decreases in the Latency of Smooth Pursuit and Saccadic Eye Movements Produced by the “Gap Paradigm” in the Monkey. Vision Research. 36(13). 1973–1985. 63 indexed citations
19.
Busettini, C., F. A. Miles, Urs Schwarz, & J. R. Carl. (1994). Human ocular responses to translation of the observer and of the scene: dependence on viewing distance. Experimental Brain Research. 100(3). 484–494. 80 indexed citations
20.
Miles, F. A. & Josh Wallman. (1993). Visual motion and its role in the stabilization of gaze. Elsevier eBooks. 284 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026