Ewald Schnug
About
In The Last Decade
Ewald Schnug
302 papers receiving 5.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
- Plant Science 2.3k
- Soil Science 1.2k
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Geochemistry and Petrology 815
- Pollution 758
Countries citing papers authored by Ewald Schnug
This map shows the geographic impact of Ewald Schnug's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ewald Schnug with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ewald Schnug more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ewald Schnug
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ewald Schnug. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ewald Schnug. The network helps show where Ewald Schnug may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ewald Schnug
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ewald Schnug. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ewald Schnug based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ewald Schnug. Ewald Schnug is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Physical and Chemical Assessment of Agricultural Plant Residues from some farming systems for their sustainable utilisation. | 1 |
| 3 | Phosphate rock - the chance and need for zero waste activity | 1 |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | Energy neutral mineral development processes – an overview | 0 |
| 6 | Potential and limitations of hyperspectral measurements to determine the nutritional status of maize | 1 |
| 7 | Experimental field cultivation of in vitro propagated high-yield varieties of Tropaeolum majus L. | 1 |
| 8 | Influence of sulphur and nitrogen supply on the pigment content of oilseed rape, marigold, and beetroot | 2 |
| 9 | Solubility of uranium in fertilizers | 2 |
| 10 | Mineral versus organic fertilization: conflict or synergism | 4 |
| 11 | Begrenzung von Schadstoffeinträgen bei Bewirtschaftungsmaßnahmen in der Landwirtschaft bei Düngung und Abfallverwertung : Teilvorhaben Stoffuntersuchungen | 0 |
| 12 | Effect of phosphite on soil microbial enzyme activity and the feeding activity of soil mesofauna | 5 |
| 13 | A highly specific sulfate-deficiency induced gene (sdi1) from wheat | 3 |
| 14 | Aspects of sulfur nutrition of plants : evaluation of China's current, future and available resources to correct plant nutrient sulfur deficiencies - report of the first Sino-German Sulfur Workshop | 2 |
| 15 | Application of LASSIE to improve agricultural field experimentation | 3 |
| 16 | Objectives of plant nutrition research in organic farming | 7 |
| 17 | Lokales Ressourcen-Management landwirtschaftlicher Böden | 1 |
| 18 | Comparative studies of plant and soil analysis for the evaluation of the sulphur status of oilseed rape and wheat | 2 |
| 19 | Effects of the timing of sulphur on yield and yield components of wheat | 1 |
| 20 | Relations between sulphur supply and glutathione, ascorbate and glucosinolate concentrations in Brassica napus varieties | 6 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.