Evert J. Buijs
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Surgery
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Cell Biology
- Co-authors
- Gerbrand J. GroenPeter van der WurffEd T. KamphuisLeo H. VisserJosé W. GeurtsHenk J. van ZuylenRobert Jan StolkerFrancina A. Klijn
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (8 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers)Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers)
- Journals
- Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationBritish Journal of AnaesthesiaRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Evert J. Buijs
9 papers receiving 308 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 287
- Pharmacology 279
- Surgery 187
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 86
- Cell Biology 32
Countries citing papers authored by Evert J. Buijs
This map shows the geographic impact of Evert J. Buijs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evert J. Buijs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evert J. Buijs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Evert J. Buijs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Evert J. Buijs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Evert J. Buijs. The network helps show where Evert J. Buijs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Evert J. Buijs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Evert J. Buijs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Evert J. Buijs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Evert J. Buijs. Evert J. Buijs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Acute pancreatitis after propofol administration]. | 3 |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 171 | |
| 5 | 67 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 41 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | [Reflex sympathetic dystrophy vs. a factitious disorder]. | 3 |
| 12 | 3 |
About Evert J. Buijs
Evert J. Buijs is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (8 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (279 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (287 citations) and Surgery (187 citations). Evert J. Buijs has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerbrand J. Groen, Peter van der Wurff, Ed T. Kamphuis, Leo H. Visser, José W. Geurts, Henk J. van Zuylen, Robert Jan Stolker, Francina A. Klijn, Jos W.M. Geurts and Roelof Van Wijk. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.