Everett Hodge
About
In The Last Decade
Everett Hodge
9 papers receiving 755 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Molecular Biology 512
- Surgery 360
- Biomaterials 163
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 147
- Biomedical Engineering 78
Countries citing papers authored by Everett Hodge
This map shows the geographic impact of Everett Hodge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Everett Hodge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Everett Hodge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Everett Hodge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Everett Hodge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Everett Hodge. The network helps show where Everett Hodge may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Everett Hodge
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Everett Hodge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Everett Hodge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Everett Hodge. Everett Hodge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 50 | |
| 5 | 142 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 321 | |
| 8 | 189 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 19 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.