Evelien D’heer

506 total citations
22 papers, 320 citations indexed

About

Evelien D’heer is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Evelien D’heer has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 320 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Communication, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Evelien D’heer's work include Social Media and Politics (12 papers), Media Studies and Communication (10 papers) and Digital Games and Media (4 papers). Evelien D’heer is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (12 papers), Media Studies and Communication (10 papers) and Digital Games and Media (4 papers). Evelien D’heer collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and France. Evelien D’heer's co-authors include Cédric Courtois, Pieter Verdegem, Steve Paulussen, Maggie Geuens, Iris Vermeir, Rik Van de Walle, Baptist Vandersmissen, Wesley De Neve, Dimitri Schuurman and Erik Mannens and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Research, New Media & Society and Information Communication & Society.

In The Last Decade

Evelien D’heer

21 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Evelien D’heer Belgium 8 179 168 49 37 24 22 320
Juliette De Maeyer Canada 9 163 0.9× 297 1.8× 30 0.6× 12 0.3× 7 0.3× 21 385
Kristin Van Damme Belgium 9 190 1.1× 187 1.1× 25 0.5× 18 0.5× 60 2.5× 22 373
Bahareh Heravi Ireland 9 159 0.9× 182 1.1× 20 0.4× 48 1.3× 11 0.5× 27 392
Asta Zelenkauskaitė United States 12 134 0.7× 130 0.8× 37 0.8× 17 0.5× 106 4.4× 32 360
Eddy Borges-Rey Spain 10 161 0.9× 305 1.8× 32 0.7× 25 0.7× 12 0.5× 21 407
Jeroen Vanattenhoven Belgium 9 210 1.2× 75 0.4× 28 0.6× 49 1.3× 46 1.9× 24 344
Anat Ben-David Israel 12 146 0.8× 148 0.9× 34 0.7× 12 0.3× 13 0.5× 27 419
François Heinderyckx Belgium 10 151 0.8× 228 1.4× 24 0.5× 13 0.4× 5 0.2× 39 335
Marc Tuters Netherlands 7 163 0.9× 154 0.9× 9 0.2× 15 0.4× 31 1.3× 33 331
Julian Ausserhofer Austria 7 155 0.9× 296 1.8× 13 0.3× 19 0.5× 9 0.4× 12 398

Countries citing papers authored by Evelien D’heer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Evelien D’heer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evelien D’heer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evelien D’heer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Evelien D’heer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Evelien D’heer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Evelien D’heer. The network helps show where Evelien D’heer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Evelien D’heer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Evelien D’heer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Evelien D’heer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Evelien D’heer. Evelien D’heer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
D’heer, Evelien, Baptist Vandersmissen, Wesley De Neve, Pieter Verdegem, & Rik Van de Walle. (2017). What are we missing? An empirical exploration in the structural biases of hashtag-based sampling on Twitter. First Monday. 9 indexed citations
2.
D’heer, Evelien, et al.. (2016). #MissingData: A methodological inquiry of the hashtag to collect data from Twitter. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. 6. 1 indexed citations
3.
Aelst, Peter Van, et al.. (2016). Who is leading the campaign charts? Comparing individual popularity on old and new media. Information Communication & Society. 20(5). 715–732. 2 indexed citations
4.
D’heer, Evelien. (2015). Political Communication in the Era of New Technologies, Bogusława Dobek-Ostrowska and Jan Garlicki (eds.) 13) Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 285 pp., ISBN: 98736316441191, h/bk, £41. 6(2). 244–245. 2 indexed citations
5.
D’heer, Evelien, et al.. (2015). How can Twitter data and viewing rates enrich one another? A conceptual and empirical comparison between viewing rates and Twitter data for TV audience research. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 2 indexed citations
6.
Verdegem, Pieter, Evelien D’heer, & Frederik De Grove. (2015). Social media in times of neoliberalism : connective action or polarization of the public debate?. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 1 indexed citations
7.
D’heer, Evelien & Pieter Verdegem. (2015). @THEVIEWER: Analyzing the offline and online impact of a dedicated conversation manager in the newsroom of a public broadcaster. New Media & Society. 18(10). 2287–2304. 2 indexed citations
8.
D’heer, Evelien & Pieter Verdegem. (2014). Conversations about the elections on Twitter: Towards a structural understanding of Twitter’s relation with the political and the media field. European Journal of Communication. 29(6). 720–734. 56 indexed citations
9.
D’heer, Evelien & Cédric Courtois. (2014). The changing dynamics of television consumption in the multimedia living room. Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 22(1). 3–17. 28 indexed citations
10.
D’heer, Evelien & Pieter Verdegem. (2014). What social media data mean for audience studies: a multidimensional investigation of Twitter use during a current affairs TV programme. Information Communication & Society. 18(2). 221–234. 34 indexed citations
11.
D’heer, Evelien, Pieter Verdegem, & Cédric Courtois. (2013). Audiences as Publics. Tweeting with the Television on.. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 3. 1 indexed citations
12.
Verdegem, Pieter, Evelien D’heer, & Peter Mechant. (2013). Tweeting the elections in Belgium. An analysis of social and traditional cross-media patterns. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 3. 1 indexed citations
13.
Paulussen, Steve & Evelien D’heer. (2013). USING CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY JOURNALISM. Journalism Practice. 7(5). 588–603. 54 indexed citations
14.
D’heer, Evelien, et al.. (2012). Bringing Newsworthiness into the 21st Century.. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 106–117. 7 indexed citations
15.
D’heer, Evelien, Cédric Courtois, & Steve Paulussen. (2012). The dynamics of multi-screen media consumption in the living room context. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 1 indexed citations
16.
D’heer, Evelien, et al.. (2012). The influence of mood on attitude–behavior consistency. Journal of Business Research. 66(7). 917–923. 23 indexed citations
17.
Courtois, Cédric, Evelien D’heer, & Dimitri Schuurman. (2012). Technological convergence in audio-visual technologies. Lirias (KU Leuven). 3(2). 187–196. 2 indexed citations
18.
D’heer, Evelien, Cédric Courtois, & Steve Paulussen. (2012). Everyday life in (front of) the screen. 195–198. 24 indexed citations
19.
D’heer, Evelien, Steve Paulussen, & Cédric Courtois. (2012). Meerdere schermen in de huiskamer. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschappen. 40(4). 1 indexed citations
20.
Courtois, Cédric & Evelien D’heer. (2012). Second screen applications and tablet users. 153–156. 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Juliette De Maeyer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kristin Van Damme Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bahareh Heravi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Asta Zelenkauskaitė Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eddy Borges-Rey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jeroen Vanattenhoven Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anat Ben-David Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by François Heinderyckx Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marc Tuters Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Julian Ausserhofer
Rankless by CCL
2026