Eva Schlinger

1.5k citations
5 papers · 106 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
˜The œPrague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics (1 paper)Figshare (1 paper)International Conference on Learning Representations (1 paper)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Eva Schlinger

4 papers receiving 97 citations

Peers

Eva Schlinger
Comparison fields: 5 of 11
  • Artificial Intelligence 104
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 32
  • Management Science and Operations Research 8
  • Language and Linguistics 6
  • Information Systems 6
Replace Clara I. Cabezas with:
Clara I. Cabezas United States
Julia Kreutzer Germany
Qijun Tan United States
Anwen Hu China
Vinit Ravishankar Malta
Sida I. Wang United States
Marco Damonte United Kingdom
Ai Ti Aw Singapore
Lasha Abzianidze Netherlands
Stephen Mussmann United States
Eva Schlinger relative to Clara I. Cabezas United States Clara I. Cabezas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Clara I. Cabezas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Schlinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Schlinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Schlinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Schlinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Schlinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Schlinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Schlinger. The network helps show where Eva Schlinger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Eva Schlinger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Schlinger Line = papers co-authored together Eva Schlinger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown

About Eva Schlinger

Eva Schlinger is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Language and Linguistics, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 5 papers that have together received 106 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Topic Modeling (5 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (1 paper), Text Readability and Simplification (1 paper), Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (1 paper), Translation Studies and Practices (1 paper) and Multimodal Machine Learning Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (104 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (32 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (8 citations), Language and Linguistics (6 citations) and Information Systems (6 citations). Eva Schlinger has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Chris Dyer, Victor Chahuneau, William Yang Wang, Noah A. Smith, Ming‐Wei Chang, William W. Cohen, Wenhu Chen, Waleed Ammar, Archna Bhatia and Alon Lavie. Their work appears in journals such as ˜The œPrague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, Figshare and International Conference on Learning Representations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact